Suppr超能文献

颈动脉内膜切除术的术前风险因素:界定高危患者

Preoperative risk factors for carotid endarterectomy: defining the patient at high risk.

作者信息

Reed Amy B, Gaccione Peter, Belkin Michael, Donaldson Magruder C, Mannick John A, Whittemore Anthony D, Conte Michael S

机构信息

Division of Vascular Surgery, University of Cincinnati Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA.

出版信息

J Vasc Surg. 2003 Jun;37(6):1191-9. doi: 10.1016/s0741-5214(03)00336-7.

Abstract

PURPOSE

The efficacy of carotid endarterectomy (CEA) for prevention of stroke has been demonstrated in randomized trials; however, the optimal approach in patients excluded from these trials or who have other significant comorbid conditions remains controversial, particularly with the advent of percutaneous interventions. We examined the influence of putative risk factors on outcome of CEA in a single-center experience.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of 1370 consecutive CEA performed from 1990 to 1999 was undertaken. Preoperative risk factors examined included age older than 80 years, congestive heart failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, renal failure (serum creatinine concentration > 2.0 mg/dL), contralateral carotid artery occlusion, recurrent ipsilateral carotid artery stenosis, ipsilateral hemispheric symptoms within 6 weeks, and recent coronary bypass grafting (CABG). The Fisher exact test was used to identify baseline variables associated with perioperative (30 days) risk for stroke or death. Multivariate analysis with Poisson regression was used to study the effect of all univariate criteria in combination.

RESULTS

In the overall cohort, there were 32 adverse events (2.3%), including 11 deaths (0.8%), 6 disabling strokes (0.4%), and 10 nondisabling strokes (0.7%). There was no significant difference in incidence of perioperative stroke or death between patients with one or more risk factors (n = 689) and those with no risk factors (low risk, n = 681). Thirty-day mortality was significantly greater in patients with two or more risk factors compared with patients with no risk factors (2.8% vs 0.3%; P =.04), but no significant difference was noted in perioperative stroke rate (2.3% vs 1.0%). Univariate analysis demonstrated that contralateral carotid occlusion (n = 75) was the only significant predictor of adverse outcome (5 events, 6.7%) among the variables tested; this was confirmed with multivariate analysis (relative risk, 4.3; 95% confidence interval, 1.2-12.3; P =.01). Five-year survival for patients with two or more risk factors was notably diminished compared with that for patients with no risk factors (38.7% +/- 5.9% vs 75.0% +/- 2.6%; P <.001). Contralateral occlusion was also associated with reduced 5-year survival (38 +/- 11% vs 67 +/- 2%; P <.004).

CONCLUSION

CEA can be safely performed in patients deemed at high risk, including those aged 80 years or older and others with significant comorbid conditions, with combined stroke and mortality rates comparable to those found in randomized trials, ie, the Asymptomatic Carotid Atherosclerosis Study and the North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial. Contralateral occlusion may be a predictor for moderately increased perioperative risk and for reduced long-term survival. Caution may be warranted in asymptomatic patients with multiple risk factors, in whom presumed long-term benefit of CEA may be compromised by markedly reduced 5-year survival.

摘要

目的

颈动脉内膜切除术(CEA)预防卒中的疗效已在随机试验中得到证实;然而,对于被排除在这些试验之外或患有其他严重合并症的患者,最佳治疗方法仍存在争议,尤其是随着经皮介入治疗的出现。我们在单中心经验中研究了假定风险因素对CEA预后的影响。

方法

对1990年至1999年连续进行的1370例CEA手术进行回顾性分析。检查的术前风险因素包括年龄大于80岁、充血性心力衰竭、慢性阻塞性肺疾病、肾衰竭(血清肌酐浓度>2.0mg/dL)、对侧颈动脉闭塞、同侧颈动脉复发性狭窄、6周内同侧半球症状以及近期冠状动脉搭桥术(CABG)。采用Fisher精确检验确定与围手术期(30天)卒中或死亡风险相关的基线变量。使用泊松回归进行多变量分析,以研究所有单变量标准联合作用的效果。

结果

在整个队列中,有32例不良事件(2.3%),包括1例死亡(0.8%)、6例致残性卒中(0.4%)和10例非致残性卒中(0.7%)。有一个或多个风险因素的患者(n = 689)与无风险因素的患者(低风险,n = 681)在围手术期卒中和死亡发生率上无显著差异。有两个或更多风险因素的患者30天死亡率显著高于无风险因素的患者(2.8%对0.3%;P =.04),但围手术期卒中率无显著差异(2.3%对1.0%)。单变量分析表明,在测试的变量中,对侧颈动脉闭塞(n = 75)是不良预后的唯一显著预测因素(5例事件,6.7%);多变量分析证实了这一点(相对风险,4.3;95%置信区间,1.2 - 12.3;P =.01)。与无风险因素的患者相比,有两个或更多风险因素的患者5年生存率显著降低(38.7%±5.9%对75.0%±2.6%;P <.001)。对侧闭塞也与5年生存率降低相关(38±11%对67±2%;P <.004)。

结论

CEA可安全地用于高危患者,包括80岁及以上患者和其他患有严重合并症的患者,其卒中与死亡率综合与随机试验(即无症状颈动脉粥样硬化研究和北美症状性颈动脉内膜切除术试验)中的结果相当。对侧闭塞可能是围手术期风险适度增加和长期生存率降低的预测因素。对于有多个风险因素的无症状患者可能需要谨慎,因为CEA假定的长期益处可能因5年生存率显著降低而受到影响。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验