• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

匿名戒赌者互助会的20个问题:针对西班牙人群的心理测量学研究

20 Questions of Gamblers Anonymous: A Psychometric Study with Population of Spain.

作者信息

Ursua María Prieto, Uribelarrea Luis Llavona

机构信息

Universidad Pontificia Comillas, Madrid.

出版信息

J Gambl Stud. 1998 Spring;14(1):3-15. doi: 10.1023/a:1023033924960.

DOI:10.1023/a:1023033924960
PMID:12766432
Abstract

The authors present a psychometric study of the questionnaire proposed by the Gamblers Anonymous organization for the self-assessment of problem gambling. The study was carried out in Spain with two samples: one of 127 problem gamblers (mean age: 41.67; sex: 78.7% men; mean duration of the problem: 5 years) and the other of 142 social gamblers (mean age: 38.46; sex: 60% men). The questionnaire was self-applied, in the presence of one of the investigators in case any doubts arose. The results indicate that it is a good screening instrument, with high reliability (Cronbach's alpha = 0.94), good covergent validity (the correlation with the SOGS questionnaire is high (r = 0.94; p < 0.001)), good factorial validity (the questionnaire's structure is unidimensional and coherent (just one factor explains more than 50% of the variance)), and its discriminative power is high (diagnostic efficacy = 98.88%). The study offers a comparative analysis of this instrument with other measures of problem gambling, emphasizing its extraordinary performance.

摘要

作者介绍了匿名戒赌者组织提出的用于问题赌博自我评估的问卷的心理测量学研究。该研究在西班牙进行,有两个样本:一个样本是127名问题赌徒(平均年龄:41.67岁;性别:78.7%为男性;问题平均持续时间:5年),另一个样本是142名社会赌徒(平均年龄:38.46岁;性别:60%为男性)。问卷由被调查者自行填写,如有任何疑问可在一名调查人员在场的情况下进行。结果表明,它是一种很好的筛查工具,具有高信度(克朗巴哈系数α = 0.94)、良好的收敛效度(与SOGS问卷的相关性很高(r = 0.94;p < 0.001))、良好的因子效度(问卷结构是单维且连贯的(仅一个因子解释了超过50%的方差)),并且其鉴别力很高(诊断效能 = 98.88%)。该研究对该工具与其他问题赌博测量方法进行了比较分析,强调了其卓越的表现。

相似文献

1
20 Questions of Gamblers Anonymous: A Psychometric Study with Population of Spain.匿名戒赌者互助会的20个问题:针对西班牙人群的心理测量学研究
J Gambl Stud. 1998 Spring;14(1):3-15. doi: 10.1023/a:1023033924960.
2
Empirical measures vs. perceived gambling severity among youth: why adolescent problem gamblers fail to seek treatment.青少年的实证测量与感知到的赌博严重程度:青少年问题赌徒不寻求治疗的原因。
Addict Behav. 2003 Jul;28(5):933-46. doi: 10.1016/s0306-4603(01)00283-0.
3
[Psychopathology in online pathological gamblers: a preliminary study].[网络病态赌徒的精神病理学:一项初步研究]
Encephale. 2012 Apr;38(2):156-63. doi: 10.1016/j.encep.2011.01.009. Epub 2011 Mar 24.
4
Reliability, validity, and classification accuracy of the South Oaks Gambling Screen (SOGS).南橡树赌博筛查量表(SOGS)的信度、效度及分类准确性。
Addict Behav. 2002 Jan-Feb;27(1):1-19. doi: 10.1016/s0306-4603(00)00158-1.
5
Reliability and Validity of the Work and Social Adjustment Scale in Treatment-Seeking Problem Gamblers.
J Addict Nurs. 2016 Oct/Dec;27(4):229-233. doi: 10.1097/JAN.0000000000000141.
6
The SOGS-RA vs. the MAGS-7: prevalence estimates and classification congruence.SOGS-RA与MAGS-7对比:患病率估计及分类一致性
J Gambl Stud. 2004 Fall;20(3):259-81. doi: 10.1023/B:JOGS.0000040279.26711.ef.
7
[Examination of the Young maladaptive schemes in a group of Gamblers Anonymous].[对一组匿名戒赌者中青少年适应不良模式的检查]
Psychiatr Hung. 2012;27(6):435-45.
8
The Gambling Related Cognitions Scale (GRCS): development, confirmatory factor validation and psychometric properties.赌博相关认知量表(GRCS):编制、验证性因素分析及心理测量学特性
Addiction. 2004 Jun;99(6):757-69. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2004.00753.x.
9
Craniofacial pain and disability inventory (CF-PDI): development and psychometric validation of a new questionnaire.颅面疼痛与功能障碍量表(CF-PDI):一种新问卷的编制及心理测量学验证
Pain Physician. 2014 Jan-Feb;17(1):95-108.
10
A new comprehensive diabetes health literacy scale: Development and psychometric evaluation.一个新的综合性糖尿病健康素养量表:编制与心理测量学评估。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2018 Dec;88:1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2018.08.002. Epub 2018 Aug 10.

引用本文的文献

1
Predicting Risky Decision Making (Odds Selection) in Regular Soccer Gamblers from Nigeria using Cognitive Tasks Combined with Non-Cognitive Measures.使用认知任务与非认知测量相结合预测尼日利亚常规足球博彩者的高风险决策(赔率选择)。
J Gambl Stud. 2023 Mar;39(1):103-117. doi: 10.1007/s10899-022-10159-x. Epub 2022 Sep 24.
2
Gambling problems among Lebanese adults: Arabic-Language version of the South Oaks Gambling Screen (SOGS) scale validation and correlates.黎巴嫩成年人的赌博问题:南橡树赌博筛查(SOGS)量表阿拉伯语版本的验证和相关因素。
BMC Psychol. 2022 Feb 1;10(1):18. doi: 10.1186/s40359-022-00727-6.
3
Attenuation of dopamine-induced GABA release in problem gamblers.

本文引用的文献

1
Personality dimensions of male pathological gamblers, alcoholics, and dually addicted gamblers.男性病理性赌徒、酗酒者和双重成瘾赌徒的人格维度。
J Gambl Stud. 1991 Jun;7(2):133-41. doi: 10.1007/BF01014528.
2
Follow-up of male pathological gamblers after treatment: The relationship of intellectual variables to relapse.男性病理性赌徒治疗后的随访:智力变量与复发的关系。
J Gambl Stud. 1991 Jun;7(2):99-108. doi: 10.1007/BF01014525.
3
A pathological or a compulsive gambler?病理性赌博者还是强迫性赌博者?
问题赌徒中多巴胺诱导的 GABA 释放的衰减。
Brain Behav. 2019 Mar;9(3):e01239. doi: 10.1002/brb3.1239. Epub 2019 Feb 20.
4
Genetic and Environmental Influences on Gambling: A Meta-Analysis of Twin Studies.遗传和环境对赌博的影响:一项双胞胎研究的荟萃分析。
Front Psychol. 2017 Dec 5;8:2121. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.02121. eCollection 2017.
5
Reward-seeking behavior in human narcolepsy.人类发作性睡病中的觅药行为。
J Clin Sleep Med. 2011 Jun 15;7(3):293-300. doi: 10.5664/JCSM.1076.
6
A Comparative Study of Involvement and Motivation among Casino Gamblers.赌场玩家参与度和动机的比较研究。
Psychiatry Investig. 2009 Sep;6(3):141-9. doi: 10.4306/pi.2009.6.3.141. Epub 2009 Jul 8.
7
The validity and reliability of four measures of gambling behaviour in a sample of Singapore University students.新加坡大学生样本中四种赌博行为测量方法的有效性和可靠性。
J Gambl Stud. 2008 Dec;24(4):451-62. doi: 10.1007/s10899-008-9103-y. Epub 2008 Jul 1.
8
Developing the DSM-IV-DSM-IV criteria to identify adolescent problem gambling in non-clinical populations.制定《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第四版标准以识别非临床人群中的青少年问题赌博行为。
J Gambl Stud. 2000 Autumn;16(2-3):253-73. doi: 10.1023/a:1009437115789.
9
Measuring gambling outcomes among college students.测量大学生的赌博结果。
J Gambl Stud. 2002 Winter;18(4):339-60. doi: 10.1023/a:1021013132430.
J Gambl Stud. 1991 Mar;7(1):55-64. doi: 10.1007/BF01019765.
4
A review of two measures of pathological gambling in the United States.美国两种病理性赌博评估工具的综述。
J Gambl Stud. 1990 Jun;6(2):153-63. doi: 10.1007/BF01013495.
5
Measuring pathological gambling in children: The case of fruit machines in the U.K.测量儿童病理性赌博:以英国水果机为例
J Gambl Stud. 1992 Sep;8(3):263-85. doi: 10.1007/BF01014653.
6
Prevalence estimates of adolescent gambling: a comparison of the SOGS-RA, DSM-IV-J, and the GA 20 questions.青少年赌博的患病率估计:SOGS-RA、DSM-IV-J与GA 20个问题的比较
J Gambl Stud. 2000 Autumn;16(2-3):227-51. doi: 10.1023/a:1009485031719.
7
The prevalence and demographics of pathological gamblers: implications for public health.病态赌徒的患病率及人口统计学特征:对公共卫生的影响。
Am J Public Health. 1994 Feb;84(2):237-41. doi: 10.2105/ajph.84.2.237.
8
Cognitive-behavioral treatment for adolescent pathological gamblers.青少年病理性赌博者的认知行为治疗
Behav Modif. 1994 Apr;18(2):230-42. doi: 10.1177/01454455940182006.
9
Compulsive gamblers in treatment.接受治疗的强迫性赌徒。
Br J Psychiatry. 1982 Apr;140:364-6. doi: 10.1192/bjp.140.4.364.
10
Measurement and structure of pathological gambling behavior.病理性赌博行为的测量与结构
J Pers Assess. 1985 Feb;49(1):76-81. doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa4901_14.