• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

优化澳大利亚的癌症护理

'Optimising cancer care in Australia'.

作者信息

McAvoy Brian

机构信息

University of Melbourne.

出版信息

Aust Fam Physician. 2003 May;32(5):369-72.

PMID:12772373
Abstract

'Optimising Cancer Care in Australia' is a consultative report prepared by the Clinical Oncological Society of Australia (COSA), The Cancer Council Australia (TCAA) and the National Cancer Control Initiative (NCCI). It is a blueprint for the reform of cancer care in Australia and was launched on World Cancer Day (4th February 2003). This groundbreaking document (available on the NCCI website: www.ncci.org.au) resulted from consultation with a wide range of stakeholders including consumers, health care professionals and policy makers. Themes identified by this process were developed into a workable number of key issues through a stakeholder workshop, input by a steering committee and a consultative committee, and finally by a wider process involving organisations with an interest in cancer care and reference to published evidence and international reforms. Formal input to the report was received from 140 individuals or groups, with many more having a less formal input. The report identifies key strategic steps that could make a substantial difference to cancer care, are achievable within a reasonable timeframe and at reasonable cost. These are given as recommendations, intended for early consideration, and action items intended for consideration by an implementation team or others in due course.

摘要

《优化澳大利亚癌症护理》是一份由澳大利亚临床肿瘤学会(COSA)、澳大利亚癌症理事会(TCAA)和国家癌症控制倡议组织(NCCI)共同编制的咨询报告。它是澳大利亚癌症护理改革的蓝图,于世界癌症日(2003年2月4日)发布。这份具有开创性的文件(可在NCCI网站www.ncci.org.au上获取)是在与包括消费者、医疗保健专业人员和政策制定者在内的广泛利益相关者进行磋商后产生的。通过利益相关者研讨会、指导委员会和咨询委员会的意见输入,以及最终通过一个更广泛的过程,即让对癌症护理感兴趣的组织参与其中,并参考已发表的证据和国际改革措施,将这一过程中确定的主题发展成为一系列可行的关键问题。该报告收到了140个个人或团体的正式意见,还有更多人提供了不太正式的意见。该报告确定了一些关键战略步骤,这些步骤可能会对癌症护理产生重大影响,在合理的时间范围内且以合理的成本是可以实现的。这些步骤以建议的形式给出,供尽早考虑,还有一些行动项目供实施团队或其他方面在适当时候考虑。

相似文献

1
'Optimising cancer care in Australia'.优化澳大利亚的癌症护理
Aust Fam Physician. 2003 May;32(5):369-72.
2
Procedures and methods of benefit assessments for medicines in Germany.德国药品效益评估的程序和方法。
Eur J Health Econ. 2008 Nov;9 Suppl 1:5-29. doi: 10.1007/s10198-008-0122-5.
3
[Procedures and methods of benefit assessments for medicines in Germany].[德国药品效益评估的程序和方法]
Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 2008 Dec;133 Suppl 7:S225-46. doi: 10.1055/s-0028-1100954. Epub 2008 Nov 25.
4
The International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation (ILCOR) consensus on science with treatment recommendations for pediatric and neonatal patients: pediatric basic and advanced life support.国际复苏联合委员会(ILCOR)关于儿科和新生儿患者的科学共识及治疗建议:儿科基础与高级生命支持
Pediatrics. 2006 May;117(5):e955-77. doi: 10.1542/peds.2006-0206. Epub 2006 Apr 17.
5
Implementing and using quality measures for children's health care: perspectives on the state of the practice.实施和使用儿童保健质量指标:实践现状透视
Pediatrics. 2004 Jan;113(1 Pt 2):217-27.
6
A national cancer control program: the 'Down Under' experience with breast cancer.一项国家癌症控制计划:澳大利亚在乳腺癌防治方面的经验。
Cancer Causes Control. 2009 Feb;20(1):105-14. doi: 10.1007/s10552-008-9223-9. Epub 2008 Sep 13.
7
American Society of Clinical Oncology guidance statement: the cost of cancer care.美国临床肿瘤学会指导声明:癌症护理的成本
J Clin Oncol. 2009 Aug 10;27(23):3868-74. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2009.23.1183. Epub 2009 Jul 6.
8
The consultation to develop a national strategy for cancer staging in Canada.关于制定加拿大癌症分期国家战略的咨询。
Cancer Prev Control. 1998 Dec;2(6):287-94.
9
Education to improve cancer care in rural South Australia.改善南澳大利亚农村地区癌症护理的教育。
Rural Remote Health. 2009 Apr-Jun;9(2):1147. Epub 2009 Apr 21.
10
Cancer Quality Alliance: Blueprint for a better cancer care system.癌症质量联盟:构建更优癌症护理体系的蓝图。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2008 Sep-Oct;58(5):266-92. doi: 10.3322/CA.2008.0012.

引用本文的文献

1
A lung cancer nurse specialist conceptual model of practice: a mixed methods study.肺癌护理专家实践概念模型:一项混合方法研究。
Support Care Cancer. 2025 Aug 8;33(9):766. doi: 10.1007/s00520-025-09833-8.
2
Stress and coping strategies of cancer among adult cancer patients in Hawassa University comprehensive specialized hospital cancer centre in 2024: patient, family and health professional perspective.2024年哈瓦萨大学综合专科医院癌症中心成年癌症患者的压力与应对策略:患者、家庭及医护人员视角
BMC Cancer. 2025 Apr 7;25(1):621. doi: 10.1186/s12885-025-14023-0.
3
Is Fragmented Cancer Care Associated With Medical Expenditure? Nationwide Evidence From Patients With Lung Cancer Using National Insurance Claim Data.
碎片化的癌症治疗与医疗支出有关吗?利用国家保险索赔数据对肺癌患者的全国范围证据
Int J Public Health. 2023 Jul 6;68:1606000. doi: 10.3389/ijph.2023.1606000. eCollection 2023.
4
Does fragmented cancer care affect survival? Analysis of gastric cancer patients using national insurance claim data.碎片化的癌症治疗是否会影响生存?基于国民保险索赔数据的胃癌患者分析。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Dec 21;22(1):1566. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-08988-y.
5
The Effect of Multidisciplinary Team Discussion Intervention on the Prognosis of Advanced Colorectal Cancer.多学科团队讨论干预对晚期结直肠癌预后的影响
J Cancer. 2021 Apr 7;12(11):3307-3314. doi: 10.7150/jca.56171. eCollection 2021.
6
Analysis of management decisions and outcomes of a weekly multidisciplinary pediatric tumor board meeting in Uganda.乌干达每周多学科儿科肿瘤病例讨论会的管理决策与结果分析
Future Sci OA. 2019 Sep 19;5(9):FSO417. doi: 10.2144/fsoa-2019-0070.
7
How multidisciplinary are multidisciplinary team meetings in cancer care? An observational study in oncology departments in Flanders, Belgium.癌症护理中的多学科团队会议有多学科性?比利时弗拉芒地区肿瘤科室的一项观察性研究。
J Multidiscip Healthc. 2019 Feb 21;12:159-167. doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S196660. eCollection 2019.
8
Cross-sectional increase of adherence to multidisciplinary tumor board decisions.多学科肿瘤委员会决策的坚持度呈横断面增加。
BMC Cancer. 2018 Sep 29;18(1):936. doi: 10.1186/s12885-018-4841-4.
9
Quality of leadership in multidisciplinary cancer tumor boards: development and evaluation of a leadership assessment instrument (ATLAS).多学科癌症肿瘤委员会的领导力质量:领导力评估工具(ATLAS)的开发和评估。
World J Urol. 2018 Jul;36(7):1031-1038. doi: 10.1007/s00345-018-2255-1. Epub 2018 Mar 3.
10
On the Occasion of World Cancer Day 2015; the Possibility of Cancer Prevention or Treatment with Antioxidants: The Ongoing Cancer Prevention Researches.在2015年世界癌症日之际;使用抗氧化剂预防或治疗癌症的可能性:正在进行的癌症预防研究
Int J Prev Med. 2015 Nov 4;6:108. doi: 10.4103/2008-7802.169077. eCollection 2015.