Suppr超能文献

通过观察验证四年级学生对学校早餐和学校午餐的饮食回忆准确性:面对面访谈与电话访谈对比

Accuracy of fourth-graders' dietary recalls of school breakfast and school lunch validated with observations: in-person versus telephone interviews.

作者信息

Baxter Suzanne Domel, Thompson William O, Litaker Mark S, Guinn Caroline H, Frye Francesca H A, Baglio Michelle L, Shaffer Nicole M

机构信息

Department of Pediatrics, Georgia Prevention Institute HS-1640, Medical College of Georgia, Augusta, Georgia 30912-3710, USA.

出版信息

J Nutr Educ Behav. 2003 May-Jun;35(3):124-34. doi: 10.1016/s1499-4046(06)60196-6.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the accuracy of children's dietary recalls of school breakfast and school lunch validated with observations and obtained during in-person versus telephone interviews.

DESIGN

Each child was observed eating school breakfast and school lunch and was interviewed that evening about that day's intake.

SETTING

Ten elementary schools.

PARTICIPANTS

A sample of fourth-graders was randomly selected within race (black, white) and gender strata, observed, and interviewed in person (n = 33) or by telephone (n = 36).

MAIN OUTCOMES MEASURED

Rates for omissions (items observed but not reported) and intrusions (items reported but not observed) were calculated to determine accuracy for reporting items. A measure of total inaccuracy was calculated to determine inaccuracy for reporting items and amounts combined.

ANALYSIS

Analysis of variance; chi-square.

RESULTS

Interview type (in person, telephone) did not significantly affect recall accuracy. For omission rate, intrusion rate, and total inaccuracy, means were 34%, 19%, and 4.6 servings for in-person recalls and 32%, 16%, and 4.3 servings for telephone recalls of school breakfast and school lunch.

CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS

The accuracy of children's recalls of school breakfast and school lunch is not significantly different whether obtained in person or by telephone. Whether interviewed in person or by telephone, children reported only 67% of items observed; furthermore, 17% of items reported were not observed.

摘要

目的

通过观察验证并对比当面访谈与电话访谈时儿童对学校早餐和午餐饮食回忆的准确性。

设计

观察每个孩子吃学校早餐和午餐的情况,并于当晚就当天的摄入量进行访谈。

地点

十所小学。

参与者

在种族(黑人、白人)和性别分层中随机抽取四年级学生样本,进行观察,并当面访谈(n = 33)或电话访谈(n = 36)。

主要测量指标

计算遗漏率(观察到但未报告的项目)和误报率(报告了但未观察到的项目)以确定报告项目的准确性。计算总不准确率以确定报告项目和数量综合起来的不准确程度。

分析

方差分析;卡方检验。

结果

访谈方式(当面、电话)对回忆准确性无显著影响。对于学校早餐和午餐,当面回忆的遗漏率、误报率和总不准确率均值分别为34%、19%和4.6份,电话回忆的分别为32%、16%和4.3份。

结论与启示

儿童对学校早餐和午餐回忆的准确性,无论是通过当面访谈还是电话访谈获得,均无显著差异。无论是当面访谈还是电话访谈,儿童仅报告了67%观察到的项目;此外,报告的项目中有17%未被观察到。

相似文献

2
Low accuracy and low consistency of fourth-graders' school breakfast and school lunch recalls.
J Am Diet Assoc. 2002 Mar;102(3):386-95. doi: 10.1016/s0002-8223(02)90089-1.
6
Prompting methods affect the accuracy of children's school lunch recalls.
J Am Diet Assoc. 2000 Aug;100(8):911-8. doi: 10.1016/S0002-8223(00)00264-9.
7
Accuracy of children's school-breakfast reports and school-lunch reports (in 24-h dietary recalls) differs by retention interval.
Eur J Clin Nutr. 2009 Dec;63(12):1394-403. doi: 10.1038/ejcn.2009.107. Epub 2009 Sep 16.
9
Recency affects reporting accuracy of children's dietary recalls.
Ann Epidemiol. 2004 Jul;14(6):385-90. doi: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2003.07.003.

引用本文的文献

1
Packed School Lunch Food Consumption: A Childhood Plate Waste Nutrient Analysis.
Nutrients. 2023 Feb 23;15(5):1116. doi: 10.3390/nu15051116.
2
Adolescents' reports of chaos within the family home environment: Investigating associations with lifestyle behaviours and obesity.
PLoS One. 2023 Jan 26;18(1):e0280737. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0280737. eCollection 2023.
3
Lower dietary intake of magnesium is associated with more callous-unemotional traits in children.
Nutr Neurosci. 2022 Nov;25(11):2314-2323. doi: 10.1080/1028415X.2021.1963064. Epub 2021 Sep 3.
5
The New school food standards and nutrition of school children: Direct and Indirect Effect Analysis.
Econ Hum Biol. 2020 Dec;39:100918. doi: 10.1016/j.ehb.2020.100918. Epub 2020 Jul 29.
8
Can Wearable Cameras be Used to Validate School-Aged Children's Lifestyle Behaviours?
Children (Basel). 2019 Feb 1;6(2):20. doi: 10.3390/children6020020.

本文引用的文献

1
Pathways: A school-based program for the primary prevention of obesity in American Indian children.
J Nutr Biochem. 1998 Sep;9(9):535-543. doi: 10.1016/S0955-2863(98)00049-7.
3
Review and analysis of evaluation measures used in nutrition education intervention research.
J Nutr Educ Behav. 2002 Jan-Feb;34(1):2-25. doi: 10.1016/s1499-4046(06)60220-0.
4
Low accuracy and low consistency of fourth-graders' school breakfast and school lunch recalls.
J Am Diet Assoc. 2002 Mar;102(3):386-95. doi: 10.1016/s0002-8223(02)90089-1.
5
The food intake recording software system is valid among fourth-grade children.
J Am Diet Assoc. 2002 Mar;102(3):380-5. doi: 10.1016/s0002-8223(02)90088-x.
7
Comparison of the effectiveness of a telephone 24-hour dietary recall method vs an in-person method among urban African-American women.
J Am Diet Assoc. 2000 Oct;100(10):1172-7; quiz 1155-6. doi: 10.1016/S0002-8223(00)00341-2.
8
Prompting methods affect the accuracy of children's school lunch recalls.
J Am Diet Assoc. 2000 Aug;100(8):911-8. doi: 10.1016/S0002-8223(00)00264-9.
9
In-person vs telephone-administered multiple-pass 24-hour recalls in women: validation with doubly labeled water.
J Am Diet Assoc. 2000 Jul;100(7):777-83. doi: 10.1016/S0002-8223(00)00227-3.
10
Accuracy in dietary assessment: on the road to good science.
J Am Diet Assoc. 2000 Jul;100(7):775-6. doi: 10.1016/S0002-8223(00)00226-1.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验