Baxter Suzanne Domel, Hardin James W, Royer Julie A, Guinn Caroline H, Smith Albert F
Institute for Families in Society, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC 29208, USA.
J Am Diet Assoc. 2008 Aug;108(8):1305-14. doi: 10.1016/j.jada.2008.05.012.
Intrusions in dietary recalls may originate in confusion of episodic memories manifested as temporal dating errors.
Data from a validation study (concerning reporting accuracy over multiple recalls) and school foodservice production records were used to investigate origins of intrusions in school meals in children's 24-hour recalls. DESIGN/SUBJECTS/SETTING: During the 1999-2000 school year, 104 fourth-grade children were observed eating school meals on 1 to 3 nonconsecutive days separated by >or=25 days, and interviewed about the previous day's intake in the morning on the day after each observation day.
For breakfast and lunch separately, logistic regression was used to investigate the effect of time (ie, days) before the interview day on the probability that intrusions referred to items available in the school foodservice environment. Exploratory analyses were conducted for breakfast options observed and/or reported eaten.
For interviews in which reported meals met criteria to be considered school meals and that contained intrusions, of 634 and 699 items reported eaten at breakfast and lunch, respectively, 394 and 331 were intrusions. Availability in the school foodservice environment of items referred to by intrusions in reports of lunch, but not breakfast, decreased as days increased before the interview day (P=0.031 and P=0.285, respectively). Concerning breakfast, children observed eating a cold option (ie, ready-to-eat cereal, milk, juice, crackers [graham or animal]) almost always reported a cold option, whereas children observed eating a hot option (ie, non-ready-to-eat cereal entrée [eg, sausage biscuit], milk, and fruit or juice) reported a cold option in approximately 50% of interviews.
In children's 24-hour recalls, confusion of episodic memories contributes to intrusions in school lunch, and generic dietary information (eg, cold option items available daily) or confusion of episodic memories may contribute to intrusions in school breakfast. Understanding the origins of intrusions may help in developing interview methods to decrease the occurrence of intrusions.
饮食回忆中的干扰可能源于情景记忆的混淆,表现为时间日期错误。
利用一项验证研究(关于多次回忆的报告准确性)的数据和学校食品服务生产记录,调查儿童24小时回忆中学校膳食干扰的来源。
设计/研究对象/研究地点:在1999 - 2000学年,观察了104名四年级儿童在1至3个不连续的日子(间隔≥25天)吃学校膳食的情况,并在每个观察日后的早晨询问他们前一天的摄入量。
分别针对早餐和午餐,使用逻辑回归来研究访谈日前的时间(即天数)对提及学校食品服务环境中可用食物的干扰概率的影响。对观察到和/或报告食用的早餐选项进行了探索性分析。
在报告的膳食符合学校膳食标准且包含干扰的访谈中,早餐和午餐分别报告食用的634项和699项食物中,有394项和331项是干扰项。午餐报告中的干扰项所提及的食物在学校食品服务环境中的可得性随访谈日前天数增加而降低,但早餐的情况并非如此(分别为P = 0.031和P = 0.285)。关于早餐,观察到吃冷食选项(即即食谷类食品、牛奶、果汁、饼干[全麦或动物形状])的儿童几乎总是报告吃冷食选项,而观察到吃热食选项(即非即食谷类主餐[如香肠饼干]、牛奶和水果或果汁)的儿童在约50%的访谈中报告吃冷食选项。
在儿童的24小时回忆中,情景记忆的混淆导致学校午餐出现干扰,而一般饮食信息(如每日提供的冷食选项)或情景记忆的混淆可能导致学校早餐出现干扰。了解干扰的来源可能有助于开发访谈方法以减少干扰的发生。