• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[Health economics analysis of cervical cancer screening].

作者信息

Boncz Imre, Sebestyén Andor, Pál Miklós, Sándor János, Ember István

机构信息

Országos Egészségbiztosítási Pénztár, Szakmapolitikai és Koordináló Fóosztály, Budapest.

出版信息

Orv Hetil. 2003 Apr 13;144(15):713-7.

PMID:12774432
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

To reduce the high mortality rate of cervical cancer there are organized, nation-wide mass-screening programmes.

AIM

To assess the screening rate, the cost of screening and treatment and to calculate the expected epidemiological and economic gain and cost-effectiveness of mass-screening programme.

METHODS

The data derive from the financial database of the National Health Insurance Fund of Hungary from 2001. To assess the screening rate the authors used the code "No. 29601 cytological examination for screening" of out-patient care. The cost of treatment includes the cost of out-patient care, the acute and chronic inpatient care, the subsidies of medicines' prices and the expenditure on disability to work (including sickness-pay). The expected benefits of the screening programme were modelled with changing the screening interval.

RESULTS

The screening rates for 1999, 2000 and 2001 were 14.5%, 16.2% and 15.6% respectively, while the 3 year screening rate for 1999-2001 were 35.7%. The cost of treatment of cervical cancer were around 1 billion Hungarian forint in 2001. The cost of one life saved according to the current screening strategy was 16.6 million Hungarian forints (57.792 USD) with a successful screening programme, while with a less successful program it was 33.8 million Hungarian forint (118.093 USD). The cost of one life year gained according to the current screening strategy was 0.7 million Hungarian forints (2.513 USD) with a successful screening programme, while with a less successful program it was 1.5 million Hungarian forint (5.134 USD).

CONCLUSION

It is important to increase the screening rate. With increasing the screening interval for women aged between 25-65 from 1 year to 2 or 3 years, it improves the cost-effectiveness of screening programme.

摘要

相似文献

1
[Health economics analysis of cervical cancer screening].
Orv Hetil. 2003 Apr 13;144(15):713-7.
2
[Health economics analysis of breast cancer screening].[乳腺癌筛查的卫生经济学分析]
Magy Onkol. 2003;47(2):149-54. Epub 2003 Sep 16.
3
[Health economics analysis of colorectal screening].
Magy Onkol. 2004;48(2):111-5. Epub 2004 Sep 7.
4
[The coverage of cervical screening in Hungary].[匈牙利的宫颈癌筛查覆盖率]
Orv Hetil. 2007 Nov 18;148(46):2177-82. doi: 10.1556/OH.2007.28956.
5
Effect of screening for cancer in the Nordic countries on deaths, cost and quality of life up to the year 2017.北欧国家癌症筛查对截至2017年的死亡、成本和生活质量的影响。
Acta Oncol. 1997;36 Suppl 9:1-60.
6
Prevention of cervical cancer with screening programme in Branicevo District and cost-effectiveness analysis adjusted to the territory of the Republic of Serbia.在布拉尼切沃地区通过筛查计划预防宫颈癌以及根据塞尔维亚共和国领土进行成本效益分析。
J BUON. 2009 Jan-Mar;14(1):93-6.
7
[Annual epidemiological and health insurance burden of cervical cancer in Hungary].[匈牙利宫颈癌的年度流行病学及健康保险负担]
Orv Hetil. 2021 Mar 28;162(162 Suppl 1):22-29. doi: 10.1556/650.2021.32158.
8
[Costs of population cervical cancer screening program in Poland between 2007-2009].[2007 - 2009年波兰全国宫颈癌筛查项目的成本]
Ginekol Pol. 2010 Oct;81(10):750-6.
9
Cost-effectiveness of cervical-cancer screening in five developing countries.五个发展中国家宫颈癌筛查的成本效益
N Engl J Med. 2005 Nov 17;353(20):2158-68. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa044278.
10
Modeling cost-effectiveness of cervical cancer screening in Hungary.匈牙利宫颈癌筛查成本效益建模。
Value Health. 2012 Jan;15(1):39-45. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2011.10.003.