• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

通过分析腋动脉血流速度上升时间对主动脉瓣狭窄进行多普勒超声评估。

Doppler ultrasonic assessment of aortic stenosis by analysis of axillary arterial blood velocity upstroke time.

作者信息

Barnes R W, Rittenhouse E A, Miller E V

出版信息

Chest. 1976 Jul;70(1):48-50. doi: 10.1378/chest.70.1.48.

DOI:10.1378/chest.70.1.48
PMID:1277931
Abstract

Rate-corrected velocity upstroke time (VUT) was calculated from analogue Doppler ultrasound recordings of axillary artery blood flow velocity in 25 patients with aortic stenosis documented by cardiac catheterization and in 14 normal individuals. The mean VUT in normal individuals was 0.11 +/- 0.02 second (+/- 1 SD), which was significantly lower than that of patients with aortic stenosis: 0.15 +/- 0.05 second (P less than 0.005). The VUT correlated with the aortic valve index and the aortic valve mean pressure gradient with correlation coefficients of 0.62 and 0.64, respectively (P less than 0.005). Arterial blood flow velocity assessment by Doppler ultrasound may be a useful noninvasive technique to evaluate patients with aortic valve disease.

摘要

通过对25例经心导管检查证实患有主动脉瓣狭窄的患者以及14名正常个体的腋动脉血流速度进行模拟多普勒超声记录,计算出心率校正的速度上升时间(VUT)。正常个体的平均VUT为0.11±0.02秒(±1标准差),显著低于主动脉瓣狭窄患者的0.15±0.05秒(P<0.005)。VUT与主动脉瓣指数和主动脉瓣平均压力阶差相关,相关系数分别为0.62和0.64(P<0.005)。通过多普勒超声评估动脉血流速度可能是一种评估主动脉瓣疾病患者的有用的非侵入性技术。

相似文献

1
Doppler ultrasonic assessment of aortic stenosis by analysis of axillary arterial blood velocity upstroke time.通过分析腋动脉血流速度上升时间对主动脉瓣狭窄进行多普勒超声评估。
Chest. 1976 Jul;70(1):48-50. doi: 10.1378/chest.70.1.48.
2
Value and limitations of Doppler ultrasound in the evaluation of aortic stenosis: a statistical analysis of 70 consecutive patients.多普勒超声在评估主动脉瓣狭窄中的价值与局限性:70例连续患者的统计分析
Am Heart J. 1986 Jul;112(1):150-8. doi: 10.1016/0002-8703(86)90694-0.
3
[Severity of aortic stenosis assessed by Doppler techniques].[通过多普勒技术评估主动脉瓣狭窄的严重程度]
J Cardiol. 1987 Dec;17(4):807-16.
4
Aortic valve pressure gradients in patients with aortic valve stenosis: quantification with velocity-encoded cine MR imaging.主动脉瓣狭窄患者的主动脉瓣压力阶差:采用速度编码电影磁共振成像进行量化分析
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1993 May;160(5):971-7. doi: 10.2214/ajr.160.5.8470612.
5
Evaluation of aortic stenosis severity: role of contrast echocardiography in comparison with conventional echocardiography and cardiac catheterization.主动脉瓣狭窄严重程度的评估:对比超声心动图与传统超声心动图及心导管检查相比的作用。
Rev Port Cardiol. 2002 May;21(5):555-72.
6
Non-invasive assessment of aortic stenosis by Doppler ultrasound.通过多普勒超声对主动脉瓣狭窄进行无创评估。
Br Heart J. 1980 Mar;43(3):284-92. doi: 10.1136/hrt.43.3.284.
7
[Noninvasive quantification and classification of the severity of aortic stenosis using Doppler echocardiography].[使用多普勒超声心动图对主动脉瓣狭窄严重程度进行无创定量和分类]
Z Kardiol. 1992 Nov;81(11):619-26.
8
[Determination of the transaortic valve gradient in aortic stenosis by continuous Doppler echocardiography].[通过连续多普勒超声心动图测定主动脉瓣狭窄时的跨主动脉瓣压差]
Vutr Boles. 1989;28(2):35-40.
9
Reliability of new and old Doppler echocardiographic indexes of the severity of aortic stenosis in patients with a low cardiac output.低心输出量患者中评估主动脉瓣狭窄严重程度的新旧多普勒超声心动图指标的可靠性
Ital Heart J. 2002 Apr;3(4):248-55.
10
[Continuous emission Doppler study with spectrum analysis in the evaluation of aortic stenosis in adults. Apropos of 30 cases].[连续发射多普勒频谱分析研究在成人主动脉瓣狭窄评估中的应用。附30例报告]
Arch Mal Coeur Vaiss. 1987 Mar;80(3):328-33.