Vergne Laurence, Bourgeois Anke, Mpoudi-Ngole Eitel, Mougnutou Rose, Mbuagbaw Josephine, Liegeois Florian, Laurent Christian, Butel Christelle, Zekeng Léopold, Delaporte Eric, Peeters Martine
Laboratoire Retrovirus, UR36, Institut de Recherche pour le Developpement, 911 av Agropolis, BP64501, 34394 Montpellier Cedex 5, France.
Virology. 2003 Jun 5;310(2):254-66. doi: 10.1016/s0042-6822(03)00167-3.
In Yaounde, Cameroon, HIV-1 group-specific V3 serology on 1469 HIV-positive samples collected between 1996 and 2001 revealed that group O infections remained constant around 1% for 6 years. Only one group N sample was identified and 4.3% reacted with group M and O peptides. Although the sensitivity of the group-specific polymerase chain reaction (PCR) in two genomic regions was not optimal, we confirmed, in at least 6 of 49 (12.2%) dual O/M seropositive samples and in 1 of 9 group O samples, dual infection with group O and M viruses (n = 4) or with group O or M virus and an intergroup recombinant virus (n = 3). Partial env (V3-V5) sequences on a subset of 295 samples showed that at least eight subtypes and five circulating recombinant forms (CRFs) of HIV-1 group M co-circulate; more than 60% were CRF02_AG and 11% had discordant subtype/CRF designations between env and gag. Similarly as for subtype B, the proportion of syncytium-inducing strains increased when CD4 counts were low in CRF02_AG-infected patients. The V3-loop charge was significantly lower for non-syncytium-inducing strains than for syncytium-inducing strains but cannot be used as an individual marker to predict phenotype. The two predominant HIV-1 variants in Africa, CRF02_AG and subtype C, thus have different biological characteristics.
在喀麦隆雅温得,对1996年至2001年间收集的1469份HIV阳性样本进行的HIV-1组特异性V3血清学检测显示,6年来O组感染率一直稳定在1%左右。仅鉴定出1份N组样本,4.3%的样本与M组和O组肽发生反应。尽管两个基因组区域的组特异性聚合酶链反应(PCR)敏感性并非最佳,但我们在至少49份(12.2%)O/M双阳性血清样本中的6份以及9份O组样本中的1份中,证实了O组与M组病毒的双重感染(n = 4),或O组或M组病毒与组间重组病毒的双重感染(n = 3)。对295份样本子集的部分env(V3-V5)序列分析表明,HIV-1 M组至少有8种亚型和5种循环重组形式(CRF)共同流行;超过60%为CRF02_AG,11%的env和gag之间的亚型/CRF命名不一致。与B亚型类似,在CRF02_AG感染患者中,当CD4细胞计数较低时,合胞体诱导株的比例会增加。非合胞体诱导株的V3环电荷显著低于合胞体诱导株,但不能作为预测表型的个体标志物。因此,非洲两种主要的HIV-1变体CRF02_AG和C亚型具有不同的生物学特性。