Lee Sang Hoon, Kim Dong Joon, Oh Joo Han, Han Hyuk Soo, Yoo Kwang Hyun, Kim Han Soo
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2003 Jun(411):217-26. doi: 10.1097/01.blo.0000069896.31220.33.
The validity and reliability of the Musculoskeletal Tumor Society functional evaluation system were evaluated using the Nottingham Health Profile, the Short Form-36, and the EuroQol protocol to measure the quality of life of patients with malignant musculoskeletal tumors. Forty-nine patients were assessed and osteosarcoma around the knee was the most common type of tumor. Prosthetic reconstructions had been done in 55.1% of patients. In a content validity analysis, neither social nor psychologic domain was identified in the Musculoskeletal Tumor Society system. All items of the lower extremity were related to the same function-walking ability. The Musculoskeletal Tumor Society system had a strong correlation with other quality of life measures in the construct validity and the reliability, but each domain of the system was so comprehensive that it could not represent the quality of life properly. Furthermore, the preoperative and postoperative status of patients could not be compared using this system. The overall validity and reliability of the Musculoskeletal Tumor Society system seemed to be acceptable. However, this system may require additional development of the appropriate domains for evaluating the quality of life in patients with musculoskeletal tumors.
使用诺丁汉健康量表、简短健康调查问卷-36和欧洲生活质量调查协议来评估肌肉骨骼肿瘤学会功能评估系统的有效性和可靠性,以衡量恶性肌肉骨骼肿瘤患者的生活质量。对49例患者进行了评估,膝关节周围骨肉瘤是最常见的肿瘤类型。55.1%的患者进行了假体重建。在内容效度分析中,肌肉骨骼肿瘤学会系统未识别出社会领域或心理领域。下肢的所有项目都与相同的功能——行走能力相关。在结构效度和信度方面,肌肉骨骼肿瘤学会系统与其他生活质量测量方法有很强的相关性,但该系统的每个领域都过于综合,无法恰当地代表生活质量。此外,使用该系统无法比较患者的术前和术后状况。肌肉骨骼肿瘤学会系统的整体有效性和可靠性似乎是可以接受的。然而,该系统可能需要进一步开发适当的领域,以评估肌肉骨骼肿瘤患者的生活质量。