• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用可变脉冲铒钇铝石榴石激光进行微磨皮:0.5毫秒和4毫秒脉冲持续时间的比较。

Microresurfacing using the variable-pulse erbium:YAG laser: a comparison of the 0.5- and 4-ms pulse durations.

作者信息

Christian Mary M

机构信息

The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA.

出版信息

Dermatol Surg. 2003 Jun;29(6):605-11. doi: 10.1046/j.1524-4725.2003.29145.x.

DOI:10.1046/j.1524-4725.2003.29145.x
PMID:12786703
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Laser resurfacing has become less popular because of its long recovery time, significant discomfort, and potential risks. Microsurfacing employs the use of single-pass erbium:YAG (Er:YAG) "mini peels," which may be performed serially.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and patient acceptance of microresurfacing Er:YAG peels in treating facial photodamage. The variable-pulse Er:YAG system was used and was allowed a comparison of the 0.5- and 4-ms pulse widths.

METHODS

Six female patients underwent eight microresurfacing peels in a split-face fashion using the 0.5- and 4.0-ms pulse durations of a variable-pulse Er:YAG laser. Patients returned at postoperative Days 3 to 4 and 7 for clinical evaluation and Mexameter measurements.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences in healing or postoperative erythema between the 0.5- and 4-ms pulse durations on postoperative Day 7. The average time to reepithelialization was 3.6 days. In a 1-year postoperative interview, four of six patients said that they would undergo the peel again periodically, and five of six stated they had maintained some level of improvement.

CONCLUSION

Microresurfacing is an effective and well-tolerated procedure. Benefits include its tolerability under topical anesthesia, limited down time, and high patient satisfaction.

摘要

背景

激光表面重塑因恢复时间长、明显不适和潜在风险而不再那么受欢迎。微表面重塑采用单次脉冲铒:钇铝石榴石(Er:YAG)“微型换肤术”,可连续进行。

目的

本研究旨在评估微表面重塑Er:YAG换肤术治疗面部光损伤的疗效和患者接受度。使用了可变脉冲Er:YAG系统,并对0.5毫秒和4毫秒的脉冲宽度进行了比较。

方法

6名女性患者采用可变脉冲Er:YAG激光的0.5毫秒和4.0毫秒脉冲持续时间,以半脸方式接受了8次微表面重塑换肤术。患者在术后第3至4天和第7天返回进行临床评估和皮肤黑色素仪测量。

结果

术后第7天,0.5毫秒和4毫秒脉冲持续时间在愈合或术后红斑方面无显著差异。平均上皮再形成时间为3.6天。在术后1年的随访中,6名患者中有4名表示他们会定期再次接受换肤术,6名患者中有5名表示他们保持了一定程度的改善。

结论

微表面重塑是一种有效且耐受性良好的手术。其优点包括在局部麻醉下的耐受性、停机时间有限以及患者满意度高。

相似文献

1
Microresurfacing using the variable-pulse erbium:YAG laser: a comparison of the 0.5- and 4-ms pulse durations.使用可变脉冲铒钇铝石榴石激光进行微磨皮:0.5毫秒和4毫秒脉冲持续时间的比较。
Dermatol Surg. 2003 Jun;29(6):605-11. doi: 10.1046/j.1524-4725.2003.29145.x.
2
Variable pulse erbium:YAG laser skin resurfacing of perioral rhytides and side-by-side comparison with carbon dioxide laser.可变脉冲铒:钇铝石榴石激光用于口周皱纹的皮肤磨削术及与二氧化碳激光的对比研究
Lasers Surg Med. 2000;26(2):208-14. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1096-9101(2000)26:2<208::aid-lsm12>3.0.co;2-r.
3
Split-face comparison of the erbium micropeel with intense pulsed light.铒微剥脱术与强脉冲光的半脸对照研究
Dermatol Surg. 2008 Jun;34(6):763-72. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4725.2008.34144.x. Epub 2008 Mar 3.
4
SPF-RR sequential photothermal fractional resurfacing and remodeling with the variable pulse Er:YAG laser and scanner-assisted Nd:YAG laser.使用可变脉冲铒钇铝石榴石激光和扫描辅助钕钇铝石榴石激光进行SPF-RR序贯光热分次换肤和重塑
J Cosmet Laser Ther. 2009 Dec;11(4):202-11. doi: 10.3109/14764170902902814.
5
Multiple minimally invasive Erbium: Yttrium Aluminum Garnet laser mini-peels for skin rejuvenation: an objective assessment.多次微创铒:钇铝石榴石激光微剥脱术治疗皮肤老化:客观评估。
J Cosmet Dermatol. 2012 Jun;11(2):122-30. doi: 10.1111/j.1473-2165.2012.00606.x.
6
Erbium:YAG laser resurfacing of the hands, arms, and neck.铒钇铝石榴石激光用于手部、手臂和颈部的皮肤磨削术。
Dermatol Surg. 1999 Nov;25(11):831-4; discussion 834-5. doi: 10.1046/j.1524-4725.1999.99085.x.
7
Laser resurfacing with a long pulse erbium:YAG laser compared to the 950 ms pulsed CO(2) laser.长脉冲铒:钇铝石榴石激光与950毫秒脉冲二氧化碳激光的激光表面重塑对比。
Lasers Surg Med. 2001;29(2):136-41. doi: 10.1002/lsm.1099.
8
Single-pass carbon dioxide versus multiple-pass Er:YAG laser skin resurfacing: a comparison of postoperative wound healing and side-effect rates.单次二氧化碳激光与多次铒激光皮肤磨削术:术后伤口愈合及副作用发生率的比较
Dermatol Surg. 2003 Jan;29(1):80-4. doi: 10.1046/j.1524-4725.2003.29012.x.
9
Results of fractional ablative facial skin resurfacing with the erbium:yttrium-aluminium-garnet laser 1 week and 2 months after one single treatment in 30 patients.30例患者单次使用铒钇铝石榴石激光进行面部剥脱性皮肤磨削术后1周及2个月的结果。
Lasers Med Sci. 2009 Mar;24(2):186-94. doi: 10.1007/s10103-008-0545-3. Epub 2008 Feb 19.
10
Efficacy and safety of long pulse Nd:YAG laser versus fractional erbium:YAG laser in the treatment of facial skin wrinkles.长脉冲钕:钇铝石榴石激光与剥脱性铒:钇铝石榴石激光治疗面部皮肤皱纹的疗效与安全性比较
Lasers Med Sci. 2019 Apr;34(3):457-464. doi: 10.1007/s10103-018-2614-6. Epub 2018 Aug 16.

引用本文的文献

1
Effects of non-ablative Er:YAG laser on the skin and the vaginal wall: systematic review of the clinical and experimental literature.非剥脱性铒:YAG 激光对皮肤和阴道壁的影响:临床和实验文献的系统评价。
Int Urogynecol J. 2020 Dec;31(12):2473-2484. doi: 10.1007/s00192-020-04452-9. Epub 2020 Aug 11.
2
Treatment of Freckles Using a Fractional Nonablative 2940nm Erb:YAG Laser in a Series of Asian Patients.在一系列亚洲患者中使用非剥脱性2940nm铒:钇铝石榴石分数激光治疗雀斑
J Clin Aesthet Dermatol. 2017 Aug;10(8):28-30. Epub 2017 Aug 1.
3
Multiple minimally invasive Erbium: Yttrium Aluminum Garnet laser mini-peels for skin rejuvenation: an objective assessment.
多次微创铒:钇铝石榴石激光微剥脱术治疗皮肤老化:客观评估。
J Cosmet Dermatol. 2012 Jun;11(2):122-30. doi: 10.1111/j.1473-2165.2012.00606.x.