Suppr超能文献

2001年9月11日之后纽约市加强的即时症候群监测。

Enhanced drop-in syndromic surveillance in New York City following September 11, 2001.

作者信息

Das Debjani, Weiss Don, Mostashari Farzad, Treadwell Tracee, McQuiston Jennifer, Hutwagner Lori, Karpati Adam, Bornschlegel Katherine, Seeman Mathew, Turcios Reina, Terebuh Pauline, Curtis Robin, Heffernan Richard, Balter Sharon

机构信息

Syndromic Surveillance, New York City Department of Health, New York, New York 10013.

出版信息

J Urban Health. 2003 Jun;80(2 Suppl 1):i76-88. doi: 10.1007/pl00022318.

Abstract

After the 2001 World Trade Center disaster, the New York City Department of Health was under heightened alert for bioterrorist attacks in the city. An emergency department (ED) syndromic surveillance system was implemented with the assistance of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention to ensure early recognition of an increase or clustering of disease syndromes that might represent a disease outbreak, whether natural or intentional. The surveillance system was based on data collected 7 days a week at area EDs. Data collected were translated into syndromes, entered into an electronic database, and analyzed for aberrations in space and time within 24 hours. From September 14-27, personnel were stationed at 15 EDs on a 24-hour basis (first staffing period); from September 29-October 12, due to resource limitations, personnel were stationed at 12 EDs on an 18-hour basis (second staffing period). A standardized form was used to obtain demographic information and classify each patient visit into 12 syndrome categories. Seven of these represented early manifestations of bioterrorist agents. Data transfer and analysis for time and space clustering (alarms) by syndrome and age occurred daily. Retrospective analyses examined syndrome trends, differences in reporting between staffing periods, and the staff's experience during the project. A total of 67,536 reports were received. The system captured 83.9% of patient visits during the first staffing period, and 60.8% during the second staffing period (P < 0.01). Five syndromes each accounted for more than 1% of visits: trauma, asthma, gastrointestinal illness, upper/lower respiratory infection with fever, and anxiety. Citywide temporal alarms occurred eight times for three of the major bioterrorism-related syndromes. Spatial clustering alarms occurred 16 times by hospital location and 9 times by ZIP code for the same three syndromes. No outbreaks were detected. On-site staffing to facilitate data collection and entry, supported by daily analysis of ED visits, is a feasible short-term approach to syndromic surveillance during high-profile events. The resources required to operate such a system, however, cannot be sustained for the long term. This system was changed to an electronic-based ED syndromic system using triage log data that remains in operation.

摘要

2001年世界贸易中心灾难发生后,纽约市卫生部门对该市可能发生的生物恐怖袭击处于高度戒备状态。在疾病控制和预防中心的协助下,实施了一个急诊科(ED)症状监测系统,以确保能尽早识别可能代表疾病爆发(无论是自然爆发还是人为蓄意)的疾病症状的增加或聚集情况。该监测系统基于每周7天在各地区急诊科收集的数据。收集到的数据被转化为症状,输入电子数据库,并在24小时内分析其在空间和时间上的异常情况。9月14日至27日,工作人员24小时驻守在15个急诊科(第一个人员配置期);9月29日至10月12日,由于资源限制,工作人员改为18小时驻守在12个急诊科(第二个人员配置期)。使用标准化表格获取人口统计学信息,并将每次患者就诊分类为12种症状类别。其中7种代表生物恐怖制剂的早期表现。每天都会按症状和年龄对时间和空间聚集情况(警报)进行数据传输和分析。回顾性分析考察了症状趋势、不同人员配置期之间报告情况的差异以及项目期间工作人员的经验。共收到67536份报告。该系统在第一个人员配置期捕获了83.9%的患者就诊情况,在第二个人员配置期捕获了60.8%(P<0.01)。五种症状各自占就诊情况的比例均超过1%:创伤、哮喘、胃肠道疾病、伴有发热的上/下呼吸道感染以及焦虑。全市范围内,与生物恐怖主义相关的三种主要症状出现了八次时间警报。同样这三种症状,按医院位置出现了16次空间聚集警报,按邮政编码出现了9次。未检测到疫情爆发。在对急诊科就诊情况进行每日分析的支持下,通过现场人员配置来促进数据收集和录入,是在备受瞩目的事件期间进行症状监测的一种可行的短期方法。然而,运行这样一个系统所需的资源无法长期维持。该系统已改为使用仍在运行的分诊日志数据的基于电子的急诊科症状监测系统。

相似文献

1
Enhanced drop-in syndromic surveillance in New York City following September 11, 2001.
J Urban Health. 2003 Jun;80(2 Suppl 1):i76-88. doi: 10.1007/pl00022318.
4
Advancing the Use of Emergency Department Syndromic Surveillance Data, New York City, 2012-2016.
Public Health Rep. 2017 Jul/Aug;132(1_suppl):23S-30S. doi: 10.1177/0033354917711183.
8
Syndromic surveillance in public health practice, New York City.
Emerg Infect Dis. 2004 May;10(5):858-64. doi: 10.3201/eid1005.030646.

引用本文的文献

2
Emergency department syndromic surveillance systems: a systematic review.
BMC Public Health. 2020 Dec 9;20(1):1891. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-09949-y.
3
Using Syndromic Surveillance for All-Hazards Public Health Surveillance: Successes, Challenges, and the Future.
Public Health Rep. 2017 Jul/Aug;132(1_suppl):3S-6S. doi: 10.1177/0033354917708995.
4
Implementation of Syndromic Surveillance Systems in Two Rural Villages in Senegal.
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2016 Dec 7;10(12):e0005212. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0005212. eCollection 2016 Dec.
5
Success Factors of European Syndromic Surveillance Systems: A Worked Example of Applying Qualitative Comparative Analysis.
PLoS One. 2016 May 16;11(5):e0155535. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0155535. eCollection 2016.
7
The role of epidemiology in disaster response policy development.
Ann Epidemiol. 2015 May;25(5):377-86. doi: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2014.05.016. Epub 2014 Jul 3.
9
Probabilistic case detection for disease surveillance using data in electronic medical records.
Online J Public Health Inform. 2011;3(3). doi: 10.5210/ojphi.v3i3.3793. Epub 2011 Dec 22.
10
A test of syndromic surveillance using a severe acute respiratory syndrome model.
Am J Emerg Med. 2009 May;27(4):419-23. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2008.03.020.

本文引用的文献

1
Dead bird clusters as an early warning system for West Nile virus activity.
Emerg Infect Dis. 2003 Jun;9(6):641-6. doi: 10.3201/eid0906.020794.
2
Hemorrhagic fever viruses as biological weapons: medical and public health management.
JAMA. 2002 May 8;287(18):2391-405. doi: 10.1001/jama.287.18.2391.
3
Anthrax as a biological weapon, 2002: updated recommendations for management.
JAMA. 2002 May 1;287(17):2236-52. doi: 10.1001/jama.287.17.2236.
4
Tularemia as a biological weapon: medical and public health management.
JAMA. 2001 Jun 6;285(21):2763-73. doi: 10.1001/jama.285.21.2763.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验