Boonstra E, Lindbaek M, Ngome E, Tshukudu K, Fugelli P
Department of General Practice and Community Medicine, University of Oslo, Norway.
Qual Saf Health Care. 2003 Jun;12(3):168-75. doi: 10.1136/qhc.12.3.168.
To assess the quality of dispensing and patient knowledge of drugs dispensed in primary care in Botswana.
Thirty randomly assigned primary healthcare facilities in three districts of Botswana.
Patients visiting clinics and health posts.
Analysis of data from prospective participative observations of the drug dispensing process and interview of patients about their knowledge of drugs received immediately after dispensing. The quality of drug labelling was assessed by calculating mean labelling scores composed of five dispensing attributes: name of patient, and name, strength, dosage, and volume of the drug (incorrect or no labelling=0, 1 point for each correct labelling attribute; maximum score=5). Mean knowledge scores were obtained immediately after dispensing from patient recall of name and dosage of drug, duration of treatment, and reason for prescription (incorrect recall=0, 1 point for each correct recall attribute; maximum score=4).
2994 consecutive patient consultations were analysed. The mean labelling score was 2.75. Family welfare educators and pharmacy technicians scored highest (3.15 and 2.98, respectively) and untrained staff lowest (2.60). Factors independently associated with the labelling score were analgesics v other drugs, district, health posts v clinics, education of prescriber (nurse best), and years of experience of prescriber (4-11 years best). The mean patient knowledge score was 2.50. The reason for prescription of the drug(s), dosage, duration of treatment, and name of the drug(s) was recalled by 92%, 83%, 44%, and 31% of patients, respectively. The qualification level of the dispenser was the strongest factor independently associated with the knowledge score. Antibiotics had the second lowest score, both for labelling (2.39) and patient knowledge (2.39).
Only trained dispensing staff provided satisfactory quality of labelling. Patients had a fair knowledge of the drugs dispensed. The knowledge of drugs dispensed by family welfare educators was less than satisfactory. The labelling score is a useful indicator of the quality of dispensing, and the knowledge score of both the quality of prescribing and of dispensing. These indicators should be added to the WHO list of patient care indicators.
评估博茨瓦纳初级保健机构的配药质量以及患者对所配药物的了解情况。
在博茨瓦纳三个区随机分配的30个初级卫生保健机构。
到诊所和卫生站就诊的患者。
对药物配药过程进行前瞻性参与观察并在配药后立即就患者对所收药物的了解情况对患者进行访谈,分析所得数据。通过计算由五个配药属性组成的平均标签得分来评估药物标签质量,这五个属性为患者姓名以及药物的名称、规格、剂量和用量(标签错误或无标签 = 0,每个正确的标签属性得1分;最高分 = 5)。配药后立即通过患者对药物名称和剂量、治疗时长以及处方原因的回忆来获得平均知识得分(回忆错误 = 0,每个正确的回忆属性得1分;最高分 = 4)。
对2994例连续的患者诊疗进行了分析。平均标签得分为2.75。家庭福利教育工作者和药剂技术员得分最高(分别为3.15和2.98),未经培训的工作人员得分最低(2.60)。与标签得分独立相关的因素有镇痛药与其他药物、地区、卫生站与诊所、开处方者的学历(护士最佳)以及开处方者的工作年限(4至11年最佳)。患者平均知识得分为2.50。分别有92%、83%、44%和31%的患者回忆起了药物的处方原因、剂量、治疗时长和药物名称。配药者的资质水平是与知识得分独立相关的最主要因素。抗生素在标签(2.39)和患者知识(2.39)方面得分均为第二低。
只有经过培训的配药人员提供了令人满意的标签质量。患者对所配药物有一定了解。家庭福利教育工作者对所配药物的了解情况不尽人意。标签得分是配药质量的一个有用指标,而知识得分则反映了处方和配药质量。这些指标应添加到世界卫生组织的患者护理指标清单中。