Friedman Michael, LoSavio Phillip, Ibrahim Hani, Ramakrishnan Vidyasagar
Department of Otolaryngology and Bronchoesphagology, Rush-Prebytrerian-St. Luke's Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Laryngoscope. 2003 May;113(5):882-7. doi: 10.1097/00005537-200305000-00020.
To evaluate the safety, morbidity, and efficacy of radiofrequency tissue volume reduction of tonsils using two different surgical techniques and to compare these two techniques with each other and with classic tonsillectomy.
A nonrandomized retrospective review of tonsil reductions was made between 2000 and 2002 using in vivo studies associated with tonsil reduction and tonsillectomy performed either in the hospital operating room or in the outpatient treatment area.
We studied 150 patients and divided them into three main groups based on surgical technique. Group A consisted of 50 consecutive patients who underwent tonsil "ablation," Group B contained another 50 consecutive individuals who received tonsil "coblation," and Group C consisted of 50 patients who underwent classic tonsillectomy (cold dissection). Each group consisted of two subcategories of children (age range, 1-12 y) and adults (age range, 12-60 y) with chronic tonsillar hypertrophy. Most of the pediatric patients underwent adenoidectomy during the same surgical procedure. Indications for tonsillectomy were those listed by the American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery. A retrospective chart review was used to assess procedures, safety, morbidity, and efficacy of tonsil reduction and tonsillectomy. Four specific end points of morbidity were investigated: pain, return to normal diet, return to normal activity, and use of pain medication. Efficacy of tonsillectomy was determined by the clinical observation of the remaining tonsillar tissue and compared with pretreatment photographs of the tonsils.
There were no complications in any of the groups. Efficacy was assessed based on the mean tonsil reduction and was found to be 100% for tonsillectomy, 86% for the tonsil coblation technique, but only 53.6% for the ablation technique. Morbidity was minimal in groups A and B and significantly greater in Group C. The number of pain days, narcotic-use days, and days before return to normal diet and activity were greatly reduced in groups A and B when compared with classic tonsillectomy (group C). Pain levels on day 1 were less than 3 (on a scale of 1-10) in groups A and B. The number of pain days and narcotic-use days was less than 4 days in groups A and B. Similarly, most patients returned to solid diet and normal activity by day 4. Pain levels, number of narcotic-use days, and number of days to return to normal diet and activity were significantly higher for classic tonsillectomy.
Tonsil coblation has distinct advantages when compared with tonsil ablation and standard tonsillectomy. Tonsil coblation resulted in greater than 86% elimination of tonsillar tissue in both children and adults. In most patients, pain levels were minimal and limited to the first 48 hours after surgery. Return to normal diet and activity was much earlier in the coblation group versus classic tonsillectomy.
采用两种不同手术技术评估扁桃体射频组织减容术的安全性、发病率及疗效,并将这两种技术相互比较,同时与传统扁桃体切除术进行比较。
对2000年至2002年期间扁桃体减容术进行非随机回顾性研究,采用与扁桃体减容术及在医院手术室或门诊治疗区进行的扁桃体切除术相关的体内研究。
我们研究了150例患者,并根据手术技术将其分为三个主要组。A组由50例连续接受扁桃体“消融”的患者组成,B组包含另外50例连续接受扁桃体“低温等离子消融”的个体,C组由50例行传统扁桃体切除术(冷剥离)的患者组成。每组包括儿童(年龄范围1 - 12岁)和成人(年龄范围12 - 60岁)两个亚组,均患有慢性扁桃体肥大。大多数儿科患者在同一手术过程中接受了腺样体切除术。扁桃体切除术的指征为美国耳鼻咽喉 - 头颈外科学会列出的那些。采用回顾性病历审查来评估扁桃体减容术和扁桃体切除术的手术过程、安全性、发病率及疗效。研究了发病率的四个特定终点:疼痛、恢复正常饮食、恢复正常活动以及使用止痛药物。扁桃体切除术的疗效通过对剩余扁桃体组织的临床观察确定,并与扁桃体术前照片进行比较。
所有组均无并发症。根据扁桃体平均缩小情况评估疗效,发现扁桃体切除术的疗效为100%,扁桃体低温等离子消融技术为86%,但消融技术仅为53.6%。A组和B组的发病率最低,C组明显更高。与传统扁桃体切除术(C组)相比,A组和B组的疼痛天数、使用麻醉剂天数以及恢复正常饮食和活动前的天数大大减少。A组和B组术后第1天的疼痛程度小于(1 - 10分制)3分。A组和B组的疼痛天数和使用麻醉剂天数少于4天。同样,大多数患者在第4天恢复固体饮食和正常活动。传统扁桃体切除术的疼痛程度、使用麻醉剂天数以及恢复正常饮食和活动的天数明显更高。
与扁桃体消融术和标准扁桃体切除术相比,扁桃体低温等离子消融术具有明显优势。扁桃体低温等离子消融术在儿童和成人中均使扁桃体组织消除率超过86%。在大多数患者中,疼痛程度较轻,仅限于术后头48小时。与传统扁桃体切除术相比。低温等离子消融组恢复正常饮食和活动要早得多。