Alcoba Manuel, Cuevas Maria J, Perez-Simon Maria-Rosario, Mostaza Jose-Luis, Ortega Luis, Ortiz de Urbina Juan, Carro Jose A, Raya Carmen, Abad Miriam, Martin Vicente
Leon Hospital, 24071 Leon, Spain.
J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2003 Jun 1;33(2):253-8. doi: 10.1097/00126334-200306010-00022.
To assess the contribution of the determination of concentrations of indinavir (IND) in plasma to the assessment of self-reported adherence and keeping of appointments to withdraw drugs from the hospital pharmacy.
Adherence was assessed using three criteria: questionnaires, punctuality at appointments to withdraw drugs, and plasma concentrations of IND. Blood samples were obtained from 106 HIV-infected patients who had been receiving IND in combination with two nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors for longer than 6 months. Logistic regression analysis was carried out, and receiver operating characteristic curves were drawn.
The kappa index showed a low concordance for the three measures. When pharmacy appointments and self-report are used together, the nondetection of drug levels is more reliably predicted (AUC = 0.75). With the viral load as the gold standard, plasma levels contribute nothing to the information given by the other two measures combined (AUC = 0.63, AUC = 0.64).
Measurement of adherence to highly active antiretroviral therapy is complex. Because there is no gold standard for it, we demonstrated that each of three common adherence measures has shortcomings that can be minimized in a combined measurement system. Indinavir plasma levels appear to provide no additional information, so further studies are undoubtedly necessary.
评估测定血浆中茚地那韦(IND)浓度对评估自我报告的依从性以及按时到医院药房取药停药的贡献。
使用三项标准评估依从性:问卷调查、按时到药房取药以及IND的血浆浓度。从106例接受IND联合两种核苷类逆转录酶抑制剂治疗超过6个月的HIV感染患者中采集血样。进行逻辑回归分析并绘制受试者工作特征曲线。
kappa指数显示这三项测量方法的一致性较低。当药房取药情况和自我报告一起使用时,未检测到药物水平的预测更可靠(曲线下面积[AUC]=0.75)。以病毒载量作为金标准,血浆水平对其他两项测量方法联合提供的信息没有贡献(AUC=0.63,AUC=0.64)。
测量高效抗逆转录病毒治疗的依从性很复杂。由于对此没有金标准,我们证明三种常用的依从性测量方法各有缺点,在联合测量系统中这些缺点可减到最小。茚地那韦血浆水平似乎未提供额外信息,因此无疑需要进一步研究。