Wareham Nicholas J, Jakes Rupert W, Rennie Kirsten L, Schuit Jantine, Mitchell Jo, Hennings Susie, Day Nicholas E
Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Institute of Public Health, University of Cambridge, Robinson Way, CB2 2SR, UK.
Public Health Nutr. 2003 Jun;6(4):407-13. doi: 10.1079/PHN2002439.
To assess the validity and repeatability of a simple index designed to rank participants according to their energy expenditure estimated by self-report, by comparison with objectively measured energy expenditure assessed by heart-rate monitoring with individual calibration.
Energy expenditure was assessed over one year by four separate episodes of 4-day heart-rate monitoring, a method previously validated against whole-body calorimetry and doubly labelled water. Cardio-respiratory fitness was assessed by four repeated measures of sub-maximum oxygen uptake. At the end of the 12-month period, participants completed a physical activity questionnaire that assessed past-year activity. A simple four-level physical activity index was derived by combining occupational physical activity together with time participating in cycling and other physical exercise (such as keep fit, aerobics, swimming and jogging).
One hundred and seventy-three randomly selected men and women aged 40 to 65 years.
The repeatability of the physical activity index was high (weighted kappa=0.6, ). There were positive associations between the physical activity index from the questionnaire and the objective measures of the ratio of daytime energy expenditure to resting metabolic rate and cardio-respiratory fitness As an indirect test of validity, there was a positive association between the physical activity index and the ratio of energy intake, assessed by 7-day food diaries, to predicted basal metabolic rate.
The summary index of physical activity derived from the questions used in the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC) study suggest it is useful for ranking participants in terms of their physical activity in large epidemiological studies. The index is simple and easy to comprehend, which may make it suitable for situations that require a concise, global index of activity.
通过与通过个体校准的心率监测评估的客观测量能量消耗进行比较,评估一个简单指数的有效性和可重复性,该指数旨在根据自我报告估计的能量消耗对参与者进行排名。
通过四次为期4天的心率监测独立时段,对能量消耗进行了为期一年的评估,该方法先前已针对全身量热法和双标记水进行了验证。通过四次重复测量次最大摄氧量来评估心肺适能。在12个月期间结束时,参与者完成了一份评估过去一年活动的体力活动问卷。通过将职业体力活动与参与骑自行车和其他体育锻炼(如健身、有氧运动、游泳和慢跑)的时间相结合,得出了一个简单的四级体力活动指数。
173名年龄在40至65岁之间的随机选择的男性和女性。
体力活动指数的可重复性很高(加权kappa=0.6)。问卷中的体力活动指数与白天能量消耗与静息代谢率之比以及心肺适能的客观测量之间存在正相关。作为有效性的间接测试,体力活动指数与通过7天食物日记评估的能量摄入量与预测基础代谢率之比之间存在正相关。
从欧洲癌症与营养前瞻性调查(EPIC)研究中使用的问题得出的体力活动综合指数表明,它有助于在大型流行病学研究中根据参与者的体力活动对其进行排名。该指数简单易懂,这可能使其适用于需要简洁的总体活动指数的情况。