Andersen O S, Koeppe R E
Department of Physiology and Biophysics, Cornell University Medical College, New York, New York.
Physiol Rev. 1992 Oct;72(4 Suppl):S89-158. doi: 10.1152/physrev.1992.72.suppl_4.S89.
The 40 years since the seminal papers of Hodgkin and Huxley appeared have been extraordinarily productive in terms of understanding the molecular basis for electrical activity. The Hodgkin-Huxley proposal that electrical excitability should be understood in terms of voltage-dependent changes in discrete sites has been resoundingly verified. Indeed, the Hodgkin-Huxley framework is remarkable in that its essential elements have remained largely intact as molecular understanding has advanced. This robustness is, at least in part, a result of the fact that Hodgkin and Huxley developed a mathematical model, based on simple physical arguments, that was sufficiently comprehensive to describe the kinetics of the voltage-clamped currents and yet simple enough to be predictive. The predictive features were demonstrated early by the reconstruction of both space-clamped and propagated action potentials on a desk-top calculator (293) and, later, when the sites of Hodgkin and Huxley developed into being well-characterized molecular structures. Voltage- and ligand-dependent ion-selective channels are now the established framework within which cellular electrophysiology is being pursued. Moreover, electrophysiological measurements of membrane and single-channel currents have become essential tools to examine molecular questions pertaining to channel structure and activity. The last 10 years have witnessed spectacular activity, which has resulted from two developments, the giga-seal patch clamp (249) and the elucidation of primary sequences of a number of channel-forming proteins (494), along with the first outlines of their low-resolution three-dimensional structures (651). The stage is now set for 1) applying a variety of convergent techniques to decipher molecular structural details at high resolution, and 2) seeking to understand the complex dynamic functions, gating, and ion selectivity at the molecular level. The early successes are likely to be in understanding the molecular determinants of ion conductance and selectivity, initially in terms of quantitative descriptions of how a sequence modification can alter a channel's permeability characteristics. Channel gating is a far more elusive target because it involves molecular rearrangements, which are poorly understood at any level of description and which may be modified by the channel's environment. The general mechanisms of ion permeation and gating will differ among different classes of ion channels, but a molecular understanding of either phenomenon must eventually be based on an understanding of intermolecular forces, which are invariant among all channel types.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)
自霍奇金和赫胥黎的开创性论文发表以来的40年里,在理解电活动的分子基础方面成果斐然。霍奇金-赫胥黎提出的关于应根据离散位点上电压依赖性变化来理解电兴奋性的观点已得到有力验证。事实上,霍奇金-赫胥黎框架非常出色,因为随着分子层面认识的推进,其基本要素在很大程度上依然完好无损。这种稳健性至少部分源于这样一个事实:霍奇金和赫胥黎基于简单的物理论据开发了一个数学模型,该模型足够全面,能够描述电压钳制电流的动力学,同时又足够简单以便进行预测。早期通过在台式计算器上重建空间钳制和传播的动作电位(293)展示了其预测特性,后来,当霍奇金和赫胥黎所研究的位点发展成为特征明确的分子结构时,再次证明了这一点。电压依赖性和配体依赖性离子选择性通道如今已成为细胞电生理学研究的既定框架。此外,膜电流和单通道电流的电生理测量已成为研究与通道结构和活性相关分子问题的重要工具。过去10年见证了显著的进展,这得益于两项进展:千兆封接膜片钳技术(249)以及对多种通道形成蛋白一级序列的阐明(494),还有它们低分辨率三维结构的初步轮廓(651)。现在的阶段是:1)应用各种汇聚技术以高分辨率解析分子结构细节;2)试图在分子层面理解复杂的动态功能、门控和离子选择性。早期的成功可能在于理解离子电导和选择性的分子决定因素,最初是从定量描述序列修饰如何改变通道的通透性特征方面入手。通道门控是一个更难以捉摸的目标,因为它涉及分子重排,而在任何描述层面都对此了解甚少,并且可能会受到通道环境的影响。离子通透和门控的一般机制在不同类别的离子通道中会有所不同,但对这两种现象的分子层面理解最终都必须基于对分子间力的理解,而分子间力在所有通道类型中都是不变的。(摘要截选至400字)