Murphy Deirdre J, Liebling Rachel E, Patel Roshni, Verity Lisa, Swingler Rebecca
Ninewells Hospital and Medical School, University of Dundee, UK.
BJOG. 2003 Jun;110(6):610-5.
To assess the maternal and neonatal morbidity following operative delivery in the second stage of labour in relation to the standard of obstetric care.
Cohort study.
Maternity units in two teaching hospitals in Bristol, United Kingdom. Three hundred and ninety-three women with term, singleton, cephalic pregnancies who required operative delivery in theatre at full dilatation between February 1999 and February 2000.
Morbidity was compared for completed instrumental delivery, failed instrumental delivery and immediate caesarean section in relation to duration of second stage of labour, number of pulls at attempted instrumental delivery, number of instruments used and operator experience.
Maternal trauma, admission to special care baby unit, neonatal trauma.
Failed instrumental delivery after a long second stage of labour was associated with increased maternal trauma (adjusted odds ratios [OR] 4.1, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.1, 16.5). More than three pulls at attempted instrumental delivery was associated with increased neonatal trauma for completed (adjusted OR 4.2, 95% CI 1.6, 9.5) and failed deliveries (adjusted OR 7.2, 95% CI 2.1, 24.0). Babies delivered after failed instrumental delivery with more than three pulls were at increased risk of admission to special care baby unit (adjusted OR 6.2, 95% CI 1.6, 22.8) The use of multiple instruments was associated with increased neonatal trauma (adjusted OR 3.1, 95% CI 1.5, 6.8; adjusted OR 4.4, 95% CI 1.3, 14.4, for completed and failed deliveries, respectively). Excessive pulls and multiple instrument use were associated with an initial attempt at vaginal delivery by an inexperienced operator, 25/48 (52%) and 34/75 (45%).
Guidelines for safe operative delivery in the second stage of labour should be developed and adhered to in order to reduce morbidity, particularly neonatal trauma.
评估第二产程手术分娩后的孕产妇及新生儿发病率,并探讨其与产科护理标准的关系。
队列研究。
英国布里斯托尔的两家教学医院的产科病房。选取1999年2月至2000年2月期间393例足月、单胎、头先露妊娠且在宫口开全时需要在手术室进行手术分娩的妇女。
比较在第二产程持续时间、器械助产尝试时的牵拉次数、使用器械数量及操作者经验方面,完成器械助产、器械助产失败及即刻剖宫产的发病率。
孕产妇创伤、入住特殊护理婴儿病房情况、新生儿创伤。
第二产程时间长导致器械助产失败与孕产妇创伤增加相关(校正比值比[OR] 4.1,95%置信区间[CI] 1.1,16.5)。器械助产尝试时牵拉次数超过三次,对于完成分娩(校正OR 4.2,95% CI 1.6,9.5)及助产失败的分娩(校正OR 7.2,95% CI 2.1,24.0),均与新生儿创伤增加相关。器械助产失败且牵拉次数超过三次后分娩的婴儿入住特殊护理婴儿病房的风险增加(校正OR 6.2,95% CI 1.6,22.8)。使用多种器械与新生儿创伤增加相关(校正OR 3.1,95% CI 1.5,6.8;分别针对完成分娩和助产失败的分娩,校正OR 4.4,95% CI 1.3,14.4)。过度牵拉及使用多种器械与经验不足的操作者首次尝试阴道分娩相关,分别为25/48(52%)和34/75(45%)。
应制定并遵守第二产程安全手术分娩指南,以降低发病率,尤其是新生儿创伤。