Ouwens Machteld A, van Strien Tatjana, van der Staak Cees P F
Department of Clinical Psychology and Personality, University of Nijmegen, P.O. Box 9104, Nijmegen 6500 HE, The Netherlands.
Appetite. 2003 Jun;40(3):291-8. doi: 10.1016/s0195-6663(03)00006-0.
Restrained eaters have repeatedly been found to overeat following a preload, which phenomenon is called the disinhibition effect. Remarkably, the disinhibition effect is only found when the restraint scale (RS) is used, and never when other measures of restraint, like the three-factor eating questionnaire (TFEQ) or the Dutch eating behavior questionnaire (DEBQ) are applied. Recent research has shown that tendency toward overeating appears to be a better predictor of food consumption than dietary restraint. The present study examines the predictive value of preload, tendency toward overeating and dietary restraint. An experiment was carried out with 209 female participants with the aim to evaluate whether the results of the study [Int J Eating Disorders 28 (2000) 333] are robust. In addition to the RS, the TFEQ and DEBQ were used to measure restraint and tendency toward overeating. Again, no disinhibition effect occurred, confirming the results of the previous study. Restraint, as measured by the three questionnaires, was not related to food consumption. In contrast, tendency toward overeating was significantly related to food consumption. Restraint theory's contentions that dieting leads to overeating might be valid for only some dieters, namely those with a high tendency toward overeating.
反复研究发现,节食者在摄入预负荷食物后会出现暴饮暴食的情况,这种现象被称为去抑制效应。值得注意的是,只有在使用节食量表(RS)时才会发现去抑制效应,而使用其他节食测量方法,如三因素饮食问卷(TFEQ)或荷兰饮食行为问卷(DEBQ)时则从未发现过这种效应。最近的研究表明,暴饮暴食的倾向似乎比饮食节制更能预测食物摄入量。本研究考察了预负荷、暴饮暴食倾向和饮食节制的预测价值。对209名女性参与者进行了一项实验,目的是评估该研究[《国际进食障碍杂志》28(2000)333]的结果是否可靠。除了RS之外,还使用TFEQ和DEBQ来测量节制和暴饮暴食倾向。同样,未出现去抑制效应,证实了先前研究的结果。通过这三份问卷测量的节制与食物摄入量无关。相比之下,暴饮暴食倾向与食物摄入量显著相关。节制理论认为节食会导致暴饮暴食,这一观点可能只对某些节食者有效,即那些暴饮暴食倾向较高的人。