Standing S J, Taylor R P
Department of Clinical Biochemistry, John Radcliffe Hospital, Headington, Oxford, UK.
Ann Clin Biochem. 1992 Sep;29 ( Pt 5):494-505. doi: 10.1177/000456329202900503.
We have assessed five high-throughput systems for the measurement of glycated haemoglobin and have reviewed published evaluations of individual analysers. All systems offered better precision than a widely used electroendosmosis method. The low pressure chromatography and immunoassay systems demonstrated greater between-batch imprecision than the high performance liquid chromatography analysers, the latter achieving the proposed analytical goal of between-batch coefficients of variation less than 5%. Agreement between all systems measuring HbA1 was good but there was variability amongst observed HbA1c values. The systems were also assessed for their quality of chromatographic separation, simplicity of operation, flexibility, cost and potential for interference by other haemoglobins.
我们评估了五种用于测量糖化血红蛋白的高通量系统,并回顾了已发表的各分析仪评估报告。所有系统的精密度均优于广泛使用的电渗法。低压色谱法和免疫分析系统的批间不精密度高于高效液相色谱分析仪,后者实现了批间变异系数小于5%的建议分析目标。所有测量HbA1的系统之间一致性良好,但观察到的HbA1c值存在差异。还评估了这些系统的色谱分离质量、操作简便性、灵活性、成本以及受其他血红蛋白干扰的可能性。