Smith C A, Collins C T, Cyna A M, Crowther C A
Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, The University of Adelaide, Women's and Children's Hospital, 72 King William Road, North Adelaide, Australia.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2003(2):CD003521. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003521.
Many women would like to avoid pharmacological or invasive methods of pain management in labour and this may contribute towards the popularity of complementary methods of pain management. This review examined currently available evidence supporting the use of alternative and complementary therapies for pain management in labour.
To examine the effectiveness of complementary and alternative therapies for pain management in labour on maternal and perinatal morbidity.
We searched the Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group trials register (July 2002), the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register (The Cochrane Library Issue 2, 2002), MEDLINE (1966 to July 2002), EMBASE (1980 to July 2002) and CINAHL (1980 to July 2002).
The inclusion criteria included published and unpublished randomised controlled trials comparing complementary and alternative therapies with placebo, no treatment or pharmacological forms of pain management in labour. All women whether primiparous or multiparous, and in spontaneous or induced labour, in the first and second stage of labour were included.
Meta-analysis was performed using relative risks for dichotomous outcomes and weighted mean differences for continuous outcomes. The outcome measures were maternal satisfaction, use of pharmacological pain relief and maternal and neonatal adverse outcomes.
Seven trials involving 366 women and using different modalities of pain management were included in this review. The trials included one involving acupuncture (n = 100), one involving audio-analgesia (n = 25), one involving aromatherapy (n = 22), three trials of hypnosis (n = 189) and one trial of music (n = 30). The trial of acupuncture decreased the need for pain relief (relative risk (RR) 0.56, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.39 to 0.81). Women receiving hypnosis were more satisfied with their pain management in labour compared with controls (RR 2.33, 95% CI 1.55 to 4.71). No differences were seen for women receiving aromatherapy, music or audio analgesia.
REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS: Acupuncture and hypnosis may be beneficial for the management of pain during labour. However, few complementary therapies have been subjected to proper scientific study and the number of women studied is small.
许多女性希望避免在分娩时采用药物或侵入性的疼痛管理方法,这可能促使辅助性疼痛管理方法更受欢迎。本综述研究了目前支持在分娩中使用替代疗法和辅助疗法进行疼痛管理的证据。
研究辅助性和替代性疗法用于分娩疼痛管理对孕产妇及围产期发病率的有效性。
我们检索了Cochrane妊娠与分娩组试验注册库(2002年7月)、Cochrane对照试验注册库(《Cochrane图书馆》2002年第2期)、MEDLINE(1966年至2002年7月)、EMBASE(1980年至2002年7月)和CINAHL(1980年至2002年7月)。
纳入标准包括已发表和未发表的随机对照试验,这些试验比较了辅助性和替代性疗法与安慰剂、不治疗或分娩时疼痛管理的药物形式。所有女性,无论是初产妇还是经产妇,无论是自然分娩还是引产,在分娩的第一和第二阶段均纳入。
采用二分类结局的相对风险和连续结局的加权均数差进行荟萃分析。结局指标包括产妇满意度、药物止痛的使用情况以及孕产妇和新生儿不良结局。
本综述纳入了7项试验,涉及366名女性,采用了不同的疼痛管理方式。这些试验包括一项针刺试验(n = 100)、一项音频镇痛试验(n = 25)、一项芳香疗法试验(n = 22)、三项催眠试验(n = 189)和一项音乐试验(n = 30)。针刺试验降低了止痛需求(相对风险(RR)0.56,95%置信区间(CI)0.39至0.81)。与对照组相比,接受催眠的女性对分娩时的疼痛管理更满意(RR 2.33,95%CI 1.55至4.71)。接受芳香疗法、音乐或音频镇痛的女性未见差异。
针刺和催眠可能有助于分娩时的疼痛管理。然而,很少有辅助疗法经过适当的科学研究,且研究的女性数量较少。