Suppr超能文献

耶鲁单一问题量表与贝克抑郁量表在多发性硬化症抑郁筛查中的比较评估

Comparative assessment of Yale Single Question and Beck Depression Inventory Scale in screening for depression in multiple sclerosis.

作者信息

Avasarala Jagannadha R, Cross Anne H, Trinkaus Kathryn

机构信息

Department of Neurology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO 63110, USA.

出版信息

Mult Scler. 2003 Jun;9(3):307-10. doi: 10.1191/1352458503ms900oa.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To examine if depression in multiple sclerosis (MS) can be accurately recognized using the Yale Single Question (YSQ) screen as compared with the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), a 21-item self-report rating scale for depression. In addition, we sought to assess the sensitivity, specificity the positive predictive value (PPV) and the negative predictive value (NPV) of the YSQ.

BACKGROUND

Depression associated with MS is a major contributor to morbidity. Screening for depression in patients with MS currently includes the BDI, which measures characteristic attitudes and symptoms of depression. However, in a busy outpatient clinic, the BDI might not be the most appropriate instrument, particularly if depression screening can be assessed accurately using simpler techniques that are easy to administer and consume less time. We compared the accuracy of the YSQ screen response against the BDI to screen for depression in MS patients, in an outpatient setting.

METHODS

This is a comparative outcome study of two 'instruments' used for screening depression in MS patients in an academic outpatient setting. All patients were initially screened for depression by asking patients the YSQ--'Do you frequently feel sad or depressed?', followed by BDI administration. Depression was defined as a score of > or = 13 on the BDI. One hundred and twenty successive patients who presented to the MS clinic at Washington University School of Medicine and met the criteria for diagnosis of MS were screened for depression. All patients diagnosed as having MS, regardless of type, were included in the study.

RESULTS

Of the 120 patients studied, a total of 49 of 120 were clinically depressed as defined by a BDI cut-off of > or = 13; 71 of 120 were not. The sensitivity of the YSQ was 32 of 49 = 65.3% with a 95% confidence interval (0.50, 0.78), specificity was 62 of 71 = 87.3% (0.77, 0.94), PPV was 32 of 41 = 78.0% (0.62, 0.89) and NPV was 62 of 79 = 78.5% (0.68, 0.87). Of the 49 patients depressed by BDI criteria, 17 responded 'no' to the YSQ, yielding a false-negative rate of 34.7% (0.22, 0.50). The Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney test for difference in age among those on antidepressants compared with those who were not showed no statistical difference (P = 0.35). For patients on antidepressants, the mean BDI score was 16.0+/-8.9 (mean+/-SD) and 9.5+/-8.7 for those not on antidepressants. Differences in BDI scores among patients on antidepressants versus those who were not were statistically significant (P < 0.0001). Patients on antidepressants had significantly higher BDI scores.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results show that the YSQ cannot replace the BDI as a screening instrument for depression in MS. The YSQ could not identify 34.7% of patients who were depressed by BDI criteria. However, as reported in a published study, BDI missed 30% of cases with early depression in MS when a cut-off of > or = 13 was used. The YSQ appears to be specific in ruling out depression when a patient is not depressed. MS is a chronic disease and since prevalence of depression varies, it is important to screen patients repeatedly over time so as not to miss the diagnosis. That BDI scores were higher among those taking antidepressants underscores the fact that this subset of patients need to be on medication, but the higher scores could also represent a sampling error since the duration of antidepressant use was not studied.

摘要

目的

与贝克抑郁量表(BDI,一种用于评估抑郁的21项自我报告评定量表)相比,检验耶鲁单一问题(YSQ)筛查能否准确识别多发性硬化症(MS)患者的抑郁情况。此外,我们试图评估YSQ的敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值(PPV)和阴性预测值(NPV)。

背景

与MS相关的抑郁是导致发病的主要因素。目前MS患者的抑郁筛查包括BDI,它可测量抑郁的特征性态度和症状。然而,在繁忙的门诊环境中,BDI可能并非最合适的工具,特别是如果可以使用更简单、易于实施且耗时较少的技术准确评估抑郁筛查时。我们在门诊环境中比较了YSQ筛查反应与BDI在筛查MS患者抑郁方面的准确性。

方法

这是一项在学术门诊环境中对两种用于筛查MS患者抑郁的“工具”进行的比较性结果研究。所有患者首先通过询问YSQ——“你是否经常感到悲伤或抑郁?”进行抑郁筛查,随后进行BDI评定。抑郁定义为BDI得分≥13分。对连续120名到华盛顿大学医学院MS诊所就诊且符合MS诊断标准的患者进行抑郁筛查。所有诊断为MS的患者,无论类型如何,均纳入研究。

结果

在研究的120名患者中,按照BDI临界值≥13分定义,共有49名临床抑郁;120名中有71名不抑郁。YSQ的敏感性为49名中的32名=65.3%,95%置信区间为(0.50,0.78),特异性为71名中的62名=87.3%(0.77,0.94),PPV为41名中的32名=78.0%(0.62,0.89),NPV为79名中的62名=78.5%(0.68,0.87)。在49名根据BDI标准抑郁的患者中,17名对YSQ回答“否”,假阴性率为34.7%(0.22,0.50)。对服用抗抑郁药者与未服用者的年龄差异进行Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney检验,未显示出统计学差异(P = 0.35)。对于服用抗抑郁药的患者,平均BDI得分为16.0±8.9(均值±标准差),未服用者为9.5±8.7。服用抗抑郁药患者与未服用者之间的BDI得分差异具有统计学意义(P < 0.0001)。服用抗抑郁药的患者BDI得分显著更高。

结论

我们的结果表明,YSQ不能替代BDI作为MS患者抑郁的筛查工具。YSQ无法识别34.7%根据BDI标准抑郁的患者。然而,正如一项已发表研究所报道的,当使用≥13分的临界值时,BDI漏诊了30%的MS早期抑郁病例。当患者不抑郁时,YSQ似乎在排除抑郁方面具有特异性。MS是一种慢性病,由于抑郁患病率各不相同,随着时间推移对患者进行反复筛查很重要,以免漏诊。服用抗抑郁药者的BDI得分更高,这突出了这部分患者需要服药这一事实,但较高得分也可能代表抽样误差,因为未研究抗抑郁药的使用时长。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验