Suppr超能文献

[食管穿孔与破裂:治疗与预后]

[Perforation and rupture of the oesophagus: treatment and prognosis].

作者信息

Cheynel N, Arnal E, Peschaud F, Rat P, Bernard A, Favre J-P

机构信息

Service de chirurgie digestive, thoracique et cancérologique, centre hospitalier universitaire du Bocage, 2, avenue Maréchal-de-Lattre-de-Tassigny, BP 77908, 21079 cedex, Dijon, France.

出版信息

Ann Chir. 2003 Apr;128(3):163-6. doi: 10.1016/s0003-3944(03)00035-x.

Abstract

AIM OF THE STUDY

To analyze treatment and prognosis of perforations and ruptures of the oesophagus.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This retrospective study included 40 patients (26 men and 14 women; mean age = 59 +/- 17 years) with a perforation or a rupture of the oesophagus. Seven perforations were cervical: iatrogenic (n = 6) or following ingestion of a foreign body (n = 1). Thirty-three perforations were thoracic: iatrogenic (n = 15), spontaneous rupture (n = 14), following ingestion of foreign body (n = 3) or traumatic (n = 1). All patients with cervical perforations were operated on (suture or drainage). One patient with thoracic perforation died before surgery, 2 underwent non-operative treatment and 30 were operated on. Twenty-eight underwent an oesophageal procedure: suture (n = 13), oesophagectomy (n = 11) or double exclusion (n = 4). Two uderwent surgery without oesophageal procedure (one pleural decortication, and one ablation of a pleural foreign body).

RESULTS

The overall mortality rate was 17% (7/40), 21% (3/14) after spontaneous ruptures and 19% (4/21) after iatrogenic perforations (no death for other aetiologies). The mortality rate was 14% (1/7) for cervical lesions and 18% (6/33) for thoracic ones. It was 8% (1/13) after intrathoracic suture, 18% (2/11) after oesophagectomy and 50% (2/4) after double exclusion.

CONCLUSION

Iatrogenic perforation and spontaneous rupture had the same poor prognosis. Non-surgical treatment is rarely indicated. oesophagectomy is a good option in case of non suturable oesophagus or delayed operation.

摘要

研究目的

分析食管穿孔和破裂的治疗及预后情况。

材料与方法

本回顾性研究纳入了40例食管穿孔或破裂患者(26例男性和14例女性;平均年龄=59±17岁)。7例穿孔位于颈部:医源性(n=6)或异物摄入后(n=1)。33例穿孔位于胸部:医源性(n=15)、自发性破裂(n=14)、异物摄入后(n=3)或创伤性(n=1)。所有颈部穿孔患者均接受手术治疗(缝合或引流)。1例胸部穿孔患者在手术前死亡,2例接受非手术治疗,30例接受手术治疗。28例接受了食管手术:缝合(n=13)、食管切除术(n=11)或双重造口术(n=4)。2例接受了无食管手术的手术(1例胸膜剥脱术和1例胸膜异物切除术)。

结果

总死亡率为17%(7/40),自发性破裂后为21%(3/14),医源性穿孔后为19%(4/21)(其他病因无死亡病例)。颈部病变死亡率为14%(1/7),胸部病变死亡率为18%(6/33)。胸腔内缝合后为8%(1/13),食管切除术后为18%(2/11),双重造口术后为50%(2/4)。

结论

医源性穿孔和自发性破裂预后同样不佳。很少需要非手术治疗。对于无法缝合的食管或手术延迟的情况,食管切除术是一个不错的选择。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验