McFarland Michael J, Terry Spencer H, Stone Daniel A, Rasmussen Steven L, Calidonna Michael J
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Utah State University, Logan, Utah, USA.
J Air Waste Manag Assoc. 2003 Jun;53(6):724-30. doi: 10.1080/10473289.2003.10466210.
The digital opacity compliance system (DOCS) has been proposed as an alternative to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Reference Method 9 (Visual Determination of the Opacity of Emissions for Stationary Sources). The DOCS, which employs standard digital photography to estimate the opacity of visible emissions, was evaluated in a high mountain desert environment located in Weber County, UT. The DOCS recorded an average opacity deviation of 5.28% when applied to black smoke plumes having true opacities in the range of 0-100%, an error rate that was found to be significantly less than 7.5% (allowable error rate for attaining certification under Method 9). In contrast, results from estimating the opacity of white smoke plumes indicated that the accuracy of the DOCS was less than the Method 9 error rate only in the opacity range of 0-60%, over which the DOCS average opacity deviation was determined to be 6.7%. For the 0-40% opacity range, the DOCS recorded an average opacity deviation of 5.44% and 5.9% for black and white plumes, respectively. Results from the present study suggest that the DOCS has the potential to quantify visible opacity with an error rate that is significantly less than the Method 9 permissible error rate. Although encouraging, it is unclear to what extent the DOCS is affected by climatic conditions other than those encountered in a dry desert environment. Future studies should focus on evaluating the performance of the DOCS under variable weather conditions.
数字不透光率合规系统(DOCS)已被提议作为美国环境保护局参考方法9(固定源排放不透光率的目视测定)的替代方法。DOCS采用标准数码摄影来估算可见排放物的不透光率,在犹他州韦伯县的高山沙漠环境中进行了评估。当应用于真实不透光率在0 - 100%范围内的黑烟羽时,DOCS记录的平均不透光率偏差为5.28%,发现该误差率显著低于7.5%(根据方法9获得认证的允许误差率)。相比之下,估算白烟羽不透光率的结果表明,仅在0 - 60%的不透光率范围内,DOCS的准确度低于方法9的误差率,在此范围内DOCS的平均不透光率偏差被确定为6.7%。对于0 - 40%的不透光率范围,DOCS记录的黑烟羽和白烟羽的平均不透光率偏差分别为5.44%和5.9%。本研究结果表明,DOCS有潜力以显著低于方法9允许误差率的误差率来量化可见不透光率。尽管令人鼓舞,但尚不清楚DOCS在多大程度上会受到干燥沙漠环境以外的气候条件的影响。未来的研究应侧重于评估DOCS在可变天气条件下的性能。