Du Ke, Rood Mark J, Kim Byung J, Kemme Michael R, Franek Bill, Mattison Kevin
University of Illinois, Urbana, Illinois, USA.
Environ Sci Technol. 2007 Feb 1;41(3):928-35. doi: 10.1021/es061277n.
The United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) developed Method 9 to describe how plume opacity can be quantified by humans. However, use of observations by humans introduces subjectivity, and is expensive due to semiannual certification requirements of the observers. The Digital Opacity Method (DOM) was developed to quantify plume opacity at lower cost, with improved objectivity, and to provide a digital record. Photographs of plumes were taken with a calibrated digital camera under specified conditions. Pixel values from those photographs were then interpreted to quantify the plume's opacity using a contrast model and a transmission model. The contrast model determines plume opacity based on pixel values that are related to the change in contrast between two backgrounds that are located behind and next to the plume. The transmission model determines the plume's opacity based on pixel values that are related to radiances from the plume and its background. DOM was field tested with a smoke generator. The individual and average opacity errors of DOM were within the USEPA Method 9 acceptable error limits for both field campaigns. Such results are encouraging and support the use of DOM as an alternative to Method 9.
美国环境保护局(USEPA)制定了方法9来描述如何由人工对烟羽不透明度进行量化。然而,人工观测会引入主观性,并且由于观测员需要每半年进行一次资质认证,成本较高。数字不透明度方法(DOM)的开发目的是,以更低的成本、更高的客观性对烟羽不透明度进行量化,并提供数字记录。在特定条件下,使用校准后的数码相机拍摄烟羽照片。然后,利用对比度模型和透射模型对这些照片的像素值进行解读,以量化烟羽的不透明度。对比度模型根据与位于烟羽后方和旁边的两个背景之间的对比度变化相关的像素值来确定烟羽不透明度。透射模型根据与烟羽及其背景的辐射率相关的像素值来确定烟羽的不透明度。DOM使用烟雾发生器进行了现场测试。在两次现场试验中,DOM的个体和平均不透明度误差均在USEPA方法9的可接受误差范围内。这些结果令人鼓舞,并支持将DOM用作方法9的替代方法。