Suppr超能文献

夜间数字光学方法测定烟羽不透明度的评估。

Evaluation of digital optical method to determine plume opacity during nighttime.

作者信息

Du Ke, Rood Mark J, Kim Byung J, Kemme Michael R, Franek Bill, Mattison Kevin

机构信息

University of Illinois, Urbana, Illinois, USA.

出版信息

Environ Sci Technol. 2009 Feb 1;43(3):783-9. doi: 10.1021/es800483x.

Abstract

United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) set opacity standards for visual emissions from industrial sources to protect ambient air quality. USEPA developed Method 9, which is a reference method to describe how plume opacity can be quantified by human observers during daytime conditions. However, it would be beneficial to determine plume opacity with digital still cameras (DSCs) to provide graphical records of the plume and its environment during visual emission evaluation and to be able to determine plume opacity with DSCs during nighttime conditions. Digital optical method (DOM) was developed to quantify plume opacity from photographs that were provided by a DSC during daytime. Past daytime field campaigns have demonstrated that DOM provided opacity readings that met Method 9 certification requirements. In this paper, the principles and methodology of DOM to quantify plume opacity during nighttime are described. Also, results are described from a nighttime field campaign that occurred at Springfield, IL. Opacity readings provided by DOM were compared with the opacity values obtained with the reference in-stack transmissometer of the smoke generator. The average opacity errors were 2.3-3.5% for contrast model of DOM for all levels of plume opacity. The average opacity errors were 2.0-7.6% for the transmission model of DOM for plumes with opacity 0-50%. These results are encouraging and indicate that DOM has the potential to quantify plume opacity during nighttime.

摘要

美国环境保护局(USEPA)制定了工业源视觉排放的不透明度标准,以保护环境空气质量。USEPA制定了方法9,这是一种参考方法,用于描述在白天条件下人类观察者如何量化烟羽不透明度。然而,使用数码静态相机(DSC)来确定烟羽不透明度将是有益的,这样可以在视觉排放评估期间提供烟羽及其环境的图形记录,并能够在夜间条件下用DSC确定烟羽不透明度。数字光学方法(DOM)被开发出来,用于量化白天DSC提供的照片中的烟羽不透明度。过去的白天实地测量表明,DOM提供的不透明度读数符合方法9的认证要求。本文描述了DOM在夜间量化烟羽不透明度的原理和方法。此外,还描述了在伊利诺伊州斯普林菲尔德进行的夜间实地测量的结果。将DOM提供的不透明度读数与烟雾发生器的参考烟囱内透射仪获得的不透明度值进行了比较。对于所有烟羽不透明度水平,DOM对比度模型的平均不透明度误差为2.3-3.5%。对于不透明度为0-50%的烟羽,DOM透射模型的平均不透明度误差为2.0-7.6%。这些结果令人鼓舞,表明DOM有潜力在夜间量化烟羽不透明度。

相似文献

4
Field demonstration of visible opacity photographic systems.可见不透明度摄影系统的现场演示。
J Air Waste Manag Assoc. 2007 Jan;57(1):31-8. doi: 10.1080/10473289.2007.10465297.
7
Measuring visual opacity using digital imaging technology.使用数字成像技术测量视觉不透明度。
J Air Waste Manag Assoc. 2004 Mar;54(3):296-306. doi: 10.1080/10473289.2004.10470908.
10
Simulation of stack plume opacity.烟囱羽流不透明度模拟。
J Air Waste Manag Assoc. 2000 May;50(5):869-74. doi: 10.1080/10473289.2000.10464130.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验