McFarland Michael J, Rasmussen Steve L, Stone Daniel A, Palmer Glenn R, Wander Joseph D
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Utah State University, Logan, UT, USA.
J Air Waste Manag Assoc. 2006 Sep;56(9):1260-6. doi: 10.1080/10473289.2006.10464588.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Emission Measurement Center in conjunction with EPA Regions VI and VIII, the state of Utah, and the U.S. Department of Defense have conducted a series of long-term pilot and field tests to determine the accuracy and reliability of a visible opacity monitoring system consisting of a conventional digital camera and a separate computer software application for plume opacity determination. This technology, known as the Digital Opacity Compliance System (DOCS), has been successfully demonstrated at EPA-sponsored Method-9 "smoke schools", as well as at a number of government and commercially operated industrial facilities. Results from the current DOCS regulatory pilot study demonstrated that, under regulatory enforcement conditions, the average difference in opacity measurement between the DOCS technology and EPA Reference Method 9 (Method 9) was 1.12%. This opacity difference, which was computed from the evaluation of 241 regulated air sources, was found to be statistically significant at the 99% confidence level. In evaluating only those sources for which a nonzero visible opacity level was recorded, the
美国环境保护局(EPA)排放测量中心与EPA第六和第八区域、犹他州以及美国国防部联合开展了一系列长期的试点和现场测试,以确定由传统数码相机和用于烟羽不透明度测定的独立计算机软件应用程序组成的可见不透明度监测系统的准确性和可靠性。这项技术被称为数字不透明度合规系统(DOCS),已在美国环保署赞助的方法9“烟雾学校”以及一些政府和商业运营的工业设施中成功得到验证。当前DOCS监管试点研究的结果表明,在监管执法条件下,DOCS技术与EPA参考方法9(方法9)之间的不透明度测量平均差异为1.12%。根据对241个受监管空气源的评估计算得出的这种不透明度差异,在99%的置信水平上具有统计学意义。在仅评估那些记录到非零可见不透明度水平的源时,