Larivière Christian, Arsenault A Bertrand, Gravel Denis, Gagnon Denis, Loisel Patrick
Occupational Health and Safety Research Institute Robert-Sauvé, Quebec, Montreal, Canada.
J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2003 Aug;13(4):305-18. doi: 10.1016/s1050-6411(03)00039-7.
The purpose of this study was to assess (1) the reliability and (2) the sensitivity to low back pain status and gender of different EMG indices developed for the assessment of back muscle weakness, muscle fiber composition and fatigability. Healthy subjects (men and women) and chronic low back pain patients (men only) performed, in a static dynamometer, maximal and submaximal static trunk extension tasks (short and long duration) to assess weakness, fiber composition and fatigue. Surface EMG signals were recorded from four (bilateral) pairs of back muscles and three pairs of abdominal muscles. To assess reliability of the different EMG parameters, 40 male volunteers (20 controls and 20 chronic low back pain patients) were assessed on three occasions. Reliable EMG indices were achieved for both healthy and chronic low back pain subjects when specific measurement strategies were applied. The EMG parameters used to quantify weakness and fiber composition were insensitive to low back status and gender. The EMG fatigue parameters did not detect differences between genders but unexpectedly, healthy men showed higher fatigability than back pain patients. This result was attributed to the smaller absolute load that was attributed to the patients, a load that was defined relative to their maximal strength, a problematic measure with this population. An attempt was made to predict maximal back strength from anthropometric measurements but this prediction was prone to errors. The main difficulties and some potential solutions related to the assessment of back muscle intrinsic properties were discussed.
(1)为评估背部肌肉无力、肌纤维组成和疲劳性而开发的不同肌电图(EMG)指标的可靠性;(2)这些指标对下背痛状态和性别的敏感性。健康受试者(男性和女性)以及慢性下背痛患者(仅男性)在静态测力计上进行了最大和次最大静态躯干伸展任务(短时间和长时间),以评估肌肉无力、纤维组成和疲劳情况。从四对(双侧)背部肌肉和三对腹部肌肉记录表面肌电信号。为评估不同肌电参数的可靠性,对40名男性志愿者(20名对照者和20名慢性下背痛患者)进行了三次评估。当应用特定测量策略时,健康受试者和慢性下背痛受试者均获得了可靠的肌电指标。用于量化肌肉无力和纤维组成的肌电参数对下背状态和性别不敏感。肌电疲劳参数未检测到性别差异,但出乎意料的是,健康男性的疲劳性高于背痛患者。这一结果归因于患者所承受的绝对负荷较小,该负荷是相对于他们的最大力量定义的,而这对该人群来说是一个有问题的测量方法。曾尝试从人体测量学指标预测最大背部力量,但这种预测容易出错。讨论了与评估背部肌肉内在特性相关的主要困难和一些潜在解决方案。