Wang Yun, Freedman Laura, Buck Martin, Bohorquez Jose, Rutkove Seward B, Keel John
Department of Neurology, Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, Capital Medical University Beijing, China.
Department of Neurology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA.
J Electr Bioimpedance. 2019 Dec 31;10(1):103-109. doi: 10.2478/joeb-2019-0015. eCollection 2019 Jan.
The objective of this study was to determine the potential value of electrical impedance myography (EIM) for assessing lumbosacral paraspinal muscle (LPM) condition in lower back pain (LBP) patients. Standard methods for assessing the condition of LPMs, such as magnetic resonance imaging, are inconvenient and expensive. One tool that could be useful for this purpose is electrical impedance myography (EIM) a technique that can be performed rapidly at the bedside. After undergoing a screening history and examination, subjects were studied with the mView EIM device (Myolex, Inc, Boston). Bilateral LPMs were measured three times each and the two closest sets of measurements averaged on each side. Data analysis included non-parametric two-group comparisons between healthy subjects and back pain patients, receiver-operating curve analyses, and correlation analyses to age and body mass index. A total of 86 healthy individuals (median age (interquartile range) (IQR), 45.5 years (30.3-56.0 years), 42 men, 44 women) and 47 LBP (median age 51.0 year (39.5-57.5) years, 21 men, 26 women) were enrolled. Median EIM 100kHz phase was lower in the LBP patients (9.3°(IQR 8.4°-10.6°) versus 11.4°(IQR 9.4°-13.0°), p = 0.0007). Significantly increased normalized side-to-side differences were present for all three EIM variables (e.g., median 100 kHz phase 0.15 (IQR 0.07-0.31 in LBP patients versus 0.09 (IQR 0.04-0.17) in healthy individuals). A significant correlation between 100 kHz EIM phase and reactance was found with age (R=-0.46, P=0.0002 and R=-0.440, P=0.0003) but not for resistance. This study provides early evidence supporting that EIM has the potential to serve as a useful tool for evaluating the condition of LPMs.
本研究的目的是确定电阻抗肌电图(EIM)在评估下背痛(LBP)患者腰骶部椎旁肌(LPM)状况方面的潜在价值。评估LPM状况的标准方法,如磁共振成像,既不方便又昂贵。一种可用于此目的的工具是电阻抗肌电图(EIM),这是一种可在床边快速进行的技术。在接受筛查病史和检查后,受试者使用mView EIM设备(Myolex公司,波士顿)进行研究。双侧LPM各测量三次,每侧取最接近的两组测量值求平均值。数据分析包括健康受试者与背痛患者之间的非参数两组比较、受试者工作特征曲线分析以及与年龄和体重指数的相关性分析。共纳入86名健康个体(年龄中位数(四分位间距)(IQR)为45.5岁(30.3 - 56.0岁),男性42名,女性44名)和47名LBP患者(年龄中位数51.0岁(39.5 - 57.5岁),男性21名,女性26名)。LBP患者的EIM 100kHz相位中位数较低(9.3°(IQR 8.4° - 10.6°),而健康个体为11.4°(IQR 9.4° - 13.0°),p = 0.0007)。所有三个EIM变量的标准化左右差异均显著增加(例如,LBP患者100kHz相位中位数为0.15(IQR 0.07 - 0.31),而健康个体为0.09(IQR 0.04 - 0.17))。发现100kHz EIM相位与电抗之间与年龄存在显著相关性(R = -0.46,P = 0.0002和R = -0.440,P = 0.0003),但与电阻无相关性。本研究提供了早期证据支持EIM有潜力作为评估LPM状况的有用工具。