Sumida Toshiaki, Tanabe Kazuaki, Yagi Toshikazu, Kawai Junichi, Konda Toshiko, Fujii Yoko, Okada Midori, Yamaguchi Kazuto, Tani Tomoko, Morioka Shigefumi
Division of Cardiology, Kobe General Hospital, Japan.
J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2003 Jul;16(7):712-5. doi: 10.1016/S0894-7317(03)00275-X.
The clinical assessment of left ventricular systolic function in patients with atrial fibrillation is unreliable and difficult because of beat-to-beat variation. We initially evaluated an index that is on the basis of the ratio of preceding R-R (RR1) to pre-preceding R-R (RR2) intervals (RR1/RR2) for the measurement of Doppler aortic flow (peak flow velocity [Vp] and time-velocity integral [TVI] proportional to stroke volume) in 20 patients (aged 65 +/- 9.6 years) with atrial fibrillation. We obtained each parameter for >13 cardiac cycles, and the relationship between each parameter at a given cardiac beat and the RR1/RR2 ratio were evaluated by linear regression analysis. The value of each parameter at RR1/RR2 = 1 was calculated from the equation of linear regression line and compared with measured average value over all cardiac cycles. Both parameters showed a significant positive correlation with the RR1/RR2 ratio (Vp, r = 0.98, y = 1.01x + 0.61; TVI, r = 0.99, y = 1.01x + 0.26). The calculated value of each parameter at RR1/RR2 = 1 was quite similar to the average value (Vp, 97.4 +/- 30.8 vs 95.7 +/- 29.8 cm/s; TVI, 17.7 +/- 6.8 vs 17.3 +/- 6.7 cm, respectively). In the additional 20 patients (aged 77.4 +/- 15.2 years), Doppler aortic flow parameters of a single beat with identical RR1 and RR2 intervals were compared with measured average value over all cardiac cycles and showed similar results (Vp, r = 0.99, y = 0.99x + 3.4, P <.0001, bias -0.5 cm/s; TVI, r = 0.99, y = 0.92x + 1.5, P <.0001, bias 0.1 cm). In conclusion, the Doppler aortic flow at RR1/RR2 = 1 allows the left ventricular systolic parameters to be accurately evaluated during atrial fibrillation and obviates the less reliable process of averaging multiple irregular beats.
由于逐搏变化,心房颤动患者左心室收缩功能的临床评估不可靠且困难。我们最初评估了一个基于前一个R-R(RR1)与前前一个R-R(RR2)间期之比(RR1/RR2)的指标,用于测量20例(年龄65±9.6岁)心房颤动患者的多普勒主动脉血流(峰值流速[Vp]和与每搏量成正比的时间-速度积分[TVI])。我们获取了超过13个心动周期的每个参数,并通过线性回归分析评估给定心动周期的每个参数与RR1/RR2比值之间的关系。RR1/RR2 = 1时每个参数的值由线性回归线方程计算得出,并与所有心动周期的测量平均值进行比较。两个参数均与RR1/RR2比值呈显著正相关(Vp,r = 0.98,y = 1.01x + 0.61;TVI,r = 0.99,y = 1.01x + 0.26)。RR1/RR2 = 1时每个参数的计算值与平均值非常相似(Vp,分别为97.4±30.8 vs 95.7±29.8 cm/s;TVI,分别为17.7±6.8 vs 17.3±6.7 cm)。在另外20例(年龄77.4±15.2岁)患者中,将具有相同RR1和RR2间期的单个心动周期的多普勒主动脉血流参数与所有心动周期的测量平均值进行比较,结果相似(Vp,r = 0.99,y = 0.99x + 3.4,P <.0001,偏差 -0.5 cm/s;TVI,r = 0.99,y = 0.92x + 1.5,P <.0001,偏差0.1 cm)。总之,RR1/RR2 = 1时的多普勒主动脉血流能够在心房颤动期间准确评估左心室收缩参数,避免了对多个不规则心动周期进行平均的不可靠过程。