Van Den Berg M P, Crijns H J, Van Veldhuisen D J, Griep N, De Kam P J, Lie K I
Department of Cardiology, Thoraxcenter, University Hospital Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
J Card Fail. 1995 Dec;1(5):355-63. doi: 10.1016/s1071-9164(05)80004-1.
Although atrial fibrillation is common in patients with heart failure, patients with atrial fibrillation are often excluded from congestive heart failure trials or are not analyzed separately. Consequently, while the effect of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors in patients with sinus rhythm is well established, the effect on patients with atrial fibrillation is unknown. The authors hypothesized that these agents might be particularly effective in this patient category, given their antiadrenergic properties and the importance of adequate rate control. Therefore, the effects of lisinopril 10 mg once daily were evaluated in 30 patients with congestive heart failure and chronic atrial fibrillation (mean age, 68 +/- 6 years) in a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial. All patients were in New York Heart Association class II or III and were stable on conventional therapy (digoxin, diuretics, nitrates). After 6 weeks, mean peak oxygen consumption increased from 14.7 +/- 3.4 to 15.9 +/- 2.9 mL/min/kg in the lisinopril group (P = .034). Plasma norepinephrine levels during exercise and at peak exercise tended to be lower when the patients were taking lisinopril (10.8 +/- 4.2 to 8.9 +/- 4.4 nmol/L and 16.3 +/- 9.2 to 14.3 +/- 7.7 nmol/L, P < .1). Heart rate during exercise and ambulatory monitoring was not significantly affected. Left ventricular fractional shortening tended to increase after lisinopril (23 +/- 7 to 27 +/- 9%, P = .073). Left atrial volume was unchanged, as were plasma atrial natriuretic peptide levels. After subsequent electrical cardioversion, treatment was continued for 6 more weeks, allowing assessment of the effect of lisinopril on maintenance of sinus rhythm; maintenance of sinus rhythm was 71% in the lisinopril group and 36% in the placebo group (P = NS). This study shows that treatment with an angiotensin- converting enzyme inhibitor improves peak oxygen consumption in patients with congestive heart failure and chronic atrial fibrillation. Attenuation of adrenergic drive during exercise may play a role in mediating this effect.
虽然心房颤动在心力衰竭患者中很常见,但心房颤动患者往往被排除在充血性心力衰竭试验之外,或者没有被单独分析。因此,虽然血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂对窦性心律患者的疗效已得到充分证实,但其对心房颤动患者的疗效尚不清楚。作者推测,鉴于这些药物的抗肾上腺素能特性以及适当控制心率的重要性,它们可能对这类患者特别有效。因此,在一项双盲、随机、安慰剂对照试验中,对30例充血性心力衰竭合并慢性心房颤动患者(平均年龄68±6岁)评估了每日一次服用10 mg赖诺普利的效果。所有患者均为纽约心脏协会II级或III级,且在常规治疗(地高辛、利尿剂、硝酸盐)下病情稳定。6周后,赖诺普利组的平均峰值耗氧量从14.7±3.4增加到15.9±2.9 mL/min/kg(P = 0.034)。患者服用赖诺普利时,运动期间和运动峰值时的血浆去甲肾上腺素水平趋于降低(分别从10.8±4.2降至8.9±4.4 nmol/L,从16.3±9.2降至14.3±7.7 nmol/L,P < 0.1)。运动期间和动态监测时的心率未受到显著影响。服用赖诺普利后左心室缩短分数趋于增加(从23±7增加到27±9%,P = 0.073)。左心房容积和血浆心钠素水平均未改变。在随后的电复律后,治疗继续进行6周,以便评估赖诺普利对窦性心律维持的影响;赖诺普利组窦性心律维持率为71%,安慰剂组为36%(P = 无显著性差异)。这项研究表明,血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂治疗可改善充血性心力衰竭合并慢性心房颤动患者的峰值耗氧量。运动期间肾上腺素能驱动的减弱可能在介导这一效应中起作用。