Mursch K, Behnke-Mursch J
Klinik für Neurochirurgie, Zentralklinik Bad Berka, Germany. k.mursch.ned@zentralklinik-bad-berka-de
Zentralbl Neurochir. 2003;64(2):71-5. doi: 10.1055/s-2003-40375.
Patients and their care providers are increasingly turning to the internet for information. Being faced with this information of very heterogeneous quality, the physician would do well to be informed about the common internet information sources. We investigated the e-mails of a mailing list (or "support group") serving about 380 brain tumour patients and their care providers. The mails were obtained from an archive and grouped according to their topic. Within 6 months, 3,272 e-mails were distributed to every group member. Alternative treatments were the most frequently discussed topics (15 %). These discussions dealt with serious new strategies as well as dubious drugs and methods. A critical attitude towards "quacks" was common, but not the rule. More than 10 % of the mails dealt with debates about therapeutic strategy and about symptoms. The individual course of the participants' illness was often reported very frankly. Emotional support between members played another great role in the support group. Criticism of physicians was rare compared to recommendations of specific therapists (3 % vs. 4 %) and included lack of empathy or sensibility and poor communication between physicians. The brain tumour mailing list is a communication medium for brain tumour patients and their care providers, which distributes and reproduces information of heterogeneous quality. The physician faced with this information should be unbiased but cautious.
患者及其护理人员越来越多地转向互联网获取信息。面对质量参差不齐的这类信息,医生最好了解一下常见的互联网信息来源。我们调查了一个邮件列表(或“支持小组”)的邮件,该列表服务于约380名脑肿瘤患者及其护理人员。这些邮件来自一个存档,并根据主题进行了分类。在6个月内,3272封邮件被分发给了每个小组成员。替代疗法是讨论最频繁的话题(15%)。这些讨论涉及严肃的新策略以及可疑的药物和方法。对“江湖郎中”持批判态度很常见,但并非普遍现象。超过10%的邮件涉及治疗策略和症状的辩论。参与者病情的个人进展常常被非常坦率地报告。成员之间的情感支持在支持小组中也发挥了重要作用。与对特定治疗师的推荐相比,对医生的批评很少(3%对4%),批评包括缺乏同理心或敏感度以及医生之间沟通不畅。脑肿瘤邮件列表是脑肿瘤患者及其护理人员的一种交流媒介,它传播和复制质量参差不齐的信息。面对这类信息的医生应该保持公正但谨慎。