• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

从互联网乳腺癌列表获取信息的准确性与自我纠正:内容分析

Accuracy and self correction of information received from an internet breast cancer list: content analysis.

作者信息

Esquivel Adol, Meric-Bernstam Funda, Bernstam Elmer V

机构信息

School of Health Information Sciences, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, 7000 Fannin Street, Houston, TX 77030, USA.

出版信息

BMJ. 2006 Apr 22;332(7547):939-42. doi: 10.1136/bmj.38753.524201.7C. Epub 2006 Mar 2.

DOI:10.1136/bmj.38753.524201.7C
PMID:16513686
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1444809/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To determine the prevalence of false or misleading statements in messages posted by internet cancer support groups and whether these statements were identified as false or misleading and corrected by other participants in subsequent postings.

DESIGN

Analysis of content of postings.

SETTING

Internet cancer support group Breast Cancer Mailing List.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Number of false or misleading statements posted from 1 January to 23 April 2005 and whether these were identified and corrected by participants in subsequent postings.

RESULTS

10 of 4600 postings (0.22%) were found to be false or misleading. Of these, seven were identified as false or misleading by other participants and corrected within an average of four hours and 33 minutes (maximum, nine hours and nine minutes).

CONCLUSIONS

Most posted information on breast cancer was accurate. Most false or misleading statements were rapidly corrected by participants in subsequent postings.

摘要

目的

确定互联网癌症支持小组发布的信息中虚假或误导性陈述的 prevalence,以及这些陈述是否被其他参与者在后续帖子中识别为虚假或误导性并得到纠正。

设计

帖子内容分析。

设置

互联网癌症支持小组乳腺癌邮件列表。

主要观察指标

2005年1月1日至4月23日发布的虚假或误导性陈述的数量,以及这些陈述是否被参与者在后续帖子中识别并纠正。

结果

在4600条帖子中,有10条(0.22%)被发现是虚假或误导性的。其中,有7条被其他参与者识别为虚假或误导性,并在平均4小时33分钟(最长9小时9分钟)内得到纠正。

结论

大多数发布的关于乳腺癌的信息是准确的。大多数虚假或误导性陈述在后续帖子中被参与者迅速纠正。

相似文献

1
Accuracy and self correction of information received from an internet breast cancer list: content analysis.从互联网乳腺癌列表获取信息的准确性与自我纠正:内容分析
BMJ. 2006 Apr 22;332(7547):939-42. doi: 10.1136/bmj.38753.524201.7C. Epub 2006 Mar 2.
2
Assessment of an electronic mailing list for orthopaedic and trauma surgery.骨科与创伤外科电子邮件列表评估
J R Coll Surg Edinb. 1999 Feb;44(1):36-9.
3
The role of an online community for people with a rare disease: content analysis of messages posted on a primary biliary cirrhosis mailinglist.在线社区对罕见病患者的作用:对原发性胆汁性肝硬化邮件列表上发布的信息进行内容分析。
J Med Internet Res. 2005 Mar 31;7(1):e10. doi: 10.2196/jmir.7.1.e10.
4
How cancer survivors provide support on cancer-related Internet mailing lists.癌症幸存者如何在癌症相关的互联网邮件列表上提供支持。
J Med Internet Res. 2007 May 14;9(2):e12. doi: 10.2196/jmir.9.2.e12.
5
Online communication as a potential travel medicine research tool: analysis of messages posted on the TravelMed listserv.在线交流作为一种潜在的旅行医学研究工具:对TravelMed邮件列表上发布的信息进行分析
J Travel Med. 2009 Jan-Feb;16(1):7-12. doi: 10.1111/j.1708-8305.2008.00255.x.
6
What do patients with prostate or breast cancer want from an Internet site? A qualitative study of information needs.前列腺癌或乳腺癌患者希望从网站获得什么?一项关于信息需求的定性研究。
Patient Educ Couns. 2004 Apr;53(1):57-64. doi: 10.1016/S0738-3991(03)00116-2.
7
Using natural language processing to enable in-depth analysis of clinical messages posted to an Internet mailing list: a feasibility study.利用自然语言处理技术对发布到互联网邮件列表的临床信息进行深入分析:一项可行性研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2011 Nov 23;13(4):e98. doi: 10.2196/jmir.1799.
8
Information about age-related macular degeneration on the Internet.互联网上有关年龄相关性黄斑变性的信息。
South Med J. 2001 Jan;94(1):22-5.
9
Self-help on-line: an outcome evaluation of breast cancer bulletin boards.在线自助:乳腺癌公告栏的结果评估
J Health Psychol. 2005 Nov;10(6):855-62. doi: 10.1177/1359105305057319.
10
Analysis of the Spanish-speaking mailing list RADIOLOGIA.对西班牙语邮件列表“RADIOLOGIA”的分析。
Eur J Radiol. 2007 Jul;63(1):136-43. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2007.01.031. Epub 2007 Mar 6.

引用本文的文献

1
From Internet to Artificial Intelligence (Al) Bots: Symbiotic Evolutions of Digital Technologies and e-Patients.从互联网到人工智能聊天机器人:数字技术与电子患者的共生演变。
J Particip Med. 2025 Jun 4;17:e68911. doi: 10.2196/68911.
2
Beyond the EHR: How Digital Health Tools Foster Participatory Health and Self-Care for Patients with Diabetes.超越电子健康记录:数字健康工具如何促进糖尿病患者的参与式健康和自我护理。
Am J Med Open. 2023 May 6;10:100043. doi: 10.1016/j.ajmo.2023.100043. eCollection 2023 Dec.
3
A Double-Edged Sword: Quality and Credibility of Colon Cancer Screening Content on YouTube.一把双刃剑:YouTube上结肠癌筛查内容的质量与可信度
Cureus. 2024 Feb 26;16(2):e54929. doi: 10.7759/cureus.54929. eCollection 2024 Feb.
4
Navigating the Cancer Journey Using Web-Based Information: Grounded Theory Emerging From the Lived Experience of Cancer Patients and Informal Caregivers With Implications for Web-Based Content Design.利用网络信息应对癌症历程:基于癌症患者及非正式护理者生活经历的扎根理论及其对网络内容设计的启示
JMIR Cancer. 2023 May 17;9:e41740. doi: 10.2196/41740.
5
When People With Chronic Conditions Turn to Peers on Social Media to Obtain and Share Information: Systematic Review of the Implications for Relationships With Health Care Professionals.当慢性病患者在社交媒体上寻求和分享信息时转向同行:对与医疗保健专业人员关系影响的系统评价。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Apr 17;25:e41156. doi: 10.2196/41156.
6
The quality of informational social support in online health communities: A content analysis of cancer-related discussions.在线健康社区中信息性社会支持的质量:对癌症相关讨论的内容分析
Digit Health. 2023 Feb 20;9:20552076231155681. doi: 10.1177/20552076231155681. eCollection 2023 Jan-Dec.
7
A social media network analysis of trypophobia communication.社交媒体网络分析恐孔症传播。
Sci Rep. 2022 Dec 7;12(1):21163. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-25301-3.
8
Experiences, Motivations, and Perceived Impact of Participation in a Facebook-Based Support Group for Caregivers of Children and Youth With Complex Care Needs: Qualitative Descriptive Study.参与针对有复杂护理需求的儿童和青少年照顾者的脸书支持小组的经历、动机及感知影响:定性描述性研究
JMIR Pediatr Parent. 2022 Jul 6;5(3):e33172. doi: 10.2196/33172.
9
Exploring the Use of a Facebook-Based Support Group for Caregivers of Children and Youth With Complex Care Needs: Qualitative Descriptive Study.探索为有复杂护理需求的儿童和青少年的照顾者设立基于脸书的支持小组的用途:定性描述性研究。
JMIR Pediatr Parent. 2022 Jun 7;5(2):e33170. doi: 10.2196/33170.
10
Longitudinal Changes of COVID-19 Symptoms in Social Media: Observational Study.社交媒体中 COVID-19 症状的纵向变化:观察性研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Feb 16;24(2):e33959. doi: 10.2196/33959.

本文引用的文献

1
Information gathering over time by breast cancer patients.乳腺癌患者随时间推移进行的信息收集。
J Med Internet Res. 2003 Jul-Sep;5(3):e15. doi: 10.2196/jmir.5.3.e15. Epub 2003 Aug 27.
2
Internet-based interaction among brain tumour patients. Analysis of a medical mailing list.脑肿瘤患者基于互联网的互动。一份医学邮件列表分析。
Zentralbl Neurochir. 2003;64(2):71-5. doi: 10.1055/s-2003-40375.
3
Evaluation of support groups for women with breast cancer: importance of the navigator role.乳腺癌女性支持小组的评估:导航员角色的重要性。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2003 May 1;1:16. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-1-16.
4
Perceptions about complementary therapies relative to conventional therapies among adults who use both: results from a national survey.同时使用辅助疗法和传统疗法的成年人对这两种疗法的看法:一项全国性调查的结果
Ann Intern Med. 2001 Sep 4;135(5):344-51. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-135-5-200109040-00011.
5
Filtering Web pages for quality indicators: an empirical approach to finding high quality consumer health information on the World Wide Web.筛选网页的质量指标:一种在万维网上查找高质量消费者健康信息的实证方法。
Proc AMIA Symp. 1999:911-5.
6
Evaluation of cancer information on the Internet.互联网上癌症信息的评估。
Cancer. 1999 Aug 1;86(3):381-90.
7
Information exchange in an epilepsy forum on the World Wide Web.万维网上一个癫痫论坛中的信息交流。
Seizure. 1999 Feb;8(1):30-4. doi: 10.1053/seiz.1998.0217.
8
Rating health information on the Internet: navigating to knowledge or to Babel?评估互联网上的健康信息:是通向知识还是走向巴别塔?
JAMA. 1998 Feb 25;279(8):611-4. doi: 10.1001/jama.279.8.611.
9
Medical information on the Internet: a study of an electronic bulletin board.互联网上的医学信息:一项关于电子公告栏的研究
J Gen Intern Med. 1997 Aug;12(8):466-70. doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.1997.00084.x.
10
The online patient meeting.线上患者会议。
J Neurol Sci. 1996 Aug;139 Suppl:129-31. doi: 10.1016/0022-510x(96)00093-7.