Sewitch Maida J, Abrahamowicz Michal, Dobkin Patricia L, Tamblyn Robyn
Faculté de médecine, Université de Montréal C.P. 6128, Succ. Centre-Ville, Montreal, Quebec, Canada H3C 3J7.
J Behav Med. 2003 Jun;26(3):245-64. doi: 10.1023/a:1023412604715.
We report on the development and validation of an instrument to assess discordance between physicians and their patients on evaluations of health-related information: the Patient-Physician Discordance Scale (PPDS). The 10-item questionnaire is designed to be employed across chronic diseases and can be used in clinical practice and research. It measures the extent of patient-physician discordance on five aspects of the patient's health status and five aspects of the office visit. A prospective study with 200 outpatients with inflammatory bowel disease and their treating physicians revealed that the 10-item discordance scores had good construct validity and satisfactory convergent validity. Overall discordance and the three subscales, discordance on symptoms and treatment, well-being, and communication and satisfaction, identified by factor analysis, had acceptable internal consistency. Patient and physician ratings demonstrated moderate-to-high concurrent validity. Study limitations and directions for future research with PPDS are discussed.
患者-医生不一致性量表(PPDS)。这份包含10个条目的问卷设计用于各种慢性病,可用于临床实践和研究。它从患者健康状况的五个方面和门诊就诊的五个方面来衡量患者与医生之间的不一致程度。一项针对200名炎症性肠病门诊患者及其主治医生的前瞻性研究表明,这10个条目的不一致性得分具有良好的结构效度和令人满意的收敛效度。通过因素分析确定的总体不一致性以及三个子量表,即症状与治疗方面的不一致性、幸福感以及沟通与满意度,具有可接受的内部一致性。患者和医生的评分显示出中等到高度的同时效度。文中还讨论了该研究的局限性以及未来使用PPDS进行研究的方向。