• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

患者组织对患者参与癌症研究的看法、动机和经验:葡萄牙的一项试点研究。

Patient organisations' views, motivations and experiences on patient involvement in cancer research: a pilot study in Portugal.

机构信息

Nova School of Business and Economics, Universidade NOVA de Lisboa, Carcavelos, Portugal

ISCTE - Instituto Universitário de Lisboa, Lisboa, Portugal.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2024 Jan 24;14(1):e077444. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-077444.

DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2023-077444
PMID:38267237
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10824046/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To characterise Portuguese cancer-related patient organisations and analyse their views, motivations and experiences on patient involvement in cancer research.

DESIGN

A multistakeholder group, comprising patient representatives and researchers, codesigned a questionnaire after a literature review, online sessions and collaborative mind maps. In May 2021, a survey was conducted among representatives of Portuguese cancer-related patient organisations, focusing on four dimensions: experience in cancer research; perception of its outcomes; motivations and expectations on patient involvement in research; and organisation characteristics.

PARTICIPANTS

Twenty-seven representatives from Portuguese cancer-related patient organisations responded to the questionnaire, corresponding to a 64% response rate.

RESULTS

Among the surveyed organisations, 26% have participated in clinical studies. Their involvement occurred in few stages of the research process and, mostly, with low levels of engagement. They showed 'great interest' in participating in most research steps, although this is not reflected in a high perception of influence over these same steps. More than half claimed to have contributed to the increase in patient recruitment and to a better understanding of informed consent by patients involved. Ensuring that research results are more aligned with the true needs of patients is the greatest motivation. Also, our results suggest that the organisation's number of employees and its integration into a European/International network play a relevant role in patient involvement in research.

CONCLUSIONS

This study provides the first in-depth characterisation of Portuguese cancer-related patient organisations and their views, motivations and experiences on patient involvement in cancer research. Most importantly, this study revealed that most of these organisations show great interest in being involved in different R&D stages to ensure that research results are aligned with patients' needs. Their motivation should be turned into greater and more meaningful involvement in practice, so that the cancer community can benefit from the outcomes of truly patient-centred research.

摘要

目的

描述葡萄牙癌症相关患者组织的特点,并分析其对患者参与癌症研究的看法、动机和经验。

设计

一个由患者代表和研究人员组成的多利益相关者小组,在文献回顾、在线会议和协作思维导图之后共同设计了一份问卷。2021 年 5 月,对葡萄牙癌症相关患者组织的代表进行了一项调查,重点关注四个方面:在癌症研究中的经验;对其结果的看法;对患者参与研究的动机和期望;以及组织特点。

参与者

27 名来自葡萄牙癌症相关患者组织的代表回答了问卷,回应率为 64%。

结果

在所调查的组织中,26%参与过临床研究。他们的参与发生在研究过程的少数几个阶段,而且参与程度较低。他们对参与大多数研究步骤表现出“极大的兴趣”,尽管这并没有反映在对这些相同步骤的高度影响力的认知上。超过一半的人声称他们为增加患者招募和提高参与患者对知情同意的理解做出了贡献。确保研究结果更符合患者的真实需求是最大的动机。此外,我们的结果表明,组织的员工人数及其融入欧洲/国际网络的程度在患者参与研究中发挥着重要作用。

结论

本研究首次深入描述了葡萄牙癌症相关患者组织及其对患者参与癌症研究的看法、动机和经验。最重要的是,这项研究表明,这些组织中的大多数都对参与不同的研发阶段表现出极大的兴趣,以确保研究结果与患者的需求一致。他们的动机应该转化为更大、更有意义的实际参与,以便癌症界能够从真正以患者为中心的研究成果中受益。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cdcc/10824046/b65eb8a17e47/bmjopen-2023-077444f03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cdcc/10824046/b15455c5ad9c/bmjopen-2023-077444f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cdcc/10824046/95253c14f912/bmjopen-2023-077444f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cdcc/10824046/b65eb8a17e47/bmjopen-2023-077444f03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cdcc/10824046/b15455c5ad9c/bmjopen-2023-077444f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cdcc/10824046/95253c14f912/bmjopen-2023-077444f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cdcc/10824046/b65eb8a17e47/bmjopen-2023-077444f03.jpg

相似文献

1
Patient organisations' views, motivations and experiences on patient involvement in cancer research: a pilot study in Portugal.患者组织对患者参与癌症研究的看法、动机和经验:葡萄牙的一项试点研究。
BMJ Open. 2024 Jan 24;14(1):e077444. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-077444.
2
Engagement in civic organisations in old age: Motivations for participation and retention.老年参与公民组织:参与和保留的动机。
J Aging Stud. 2021 Dec;59:100977. doi: 10.1016/j.jaging.2021.100977. Epub 2021 Oct 27.
3
Patient advocate perspectives on involvement in HTA: an international snapshot.患者权益倡导者对参与卫生技术评估的看法:国际概览
Res Involv Engagem. 2017 Jan 10;3:2. doi: 10.1186/s40900-016-0052-9. eCollection 2017.
4
Developing sustainable patient and public involvement in mesothelioma research: multi-method exploration with researchers, patients, carers, and patient organisations.推动患者和公众可持续地参与间皮瘤研究:与研究人员、患者、护理人员及患者组织开展的多方法探索
Res Involv Engagem. 2023 Mar 25;9(1):15. doi: 10.1186/s40900-023-00426-5.
5
Patient involvement in clinical trials: motivation and expectations differ between patients and researchers involved in a trial on urinary tract infections.患者参与临床试验:参与尿路感染试验的患者与研究人员的动机和期望存在差异。
Res Involv Engagem. 2019 Apr 1;5:15. doi: 10.1186/s40900-019-0145-3. eCollection 2019.
6
Participant Motivators and Expectations in the MEL-SELF Randomized Clinical Trial of Patient-Led Surveillance for Recurrent Melanoma: Content Analysis of Survey Responses.MEL-SELF 随机临床试验中患者主导的复发性黑色素瘤监测的参与者动机和期望:调查回复的内容分析。
JMIR Dermatol. 2024 Oct 17;7:e58136. doi: 10.2196/58136.
7
A snapshot of consumer engagement in clinical trials in Australia: results of a national survey of clinical trial networks and research organisations.澳大利亚消费者参与临床试验的概况:一项针对临床试验网络和研究机构的全国性调查结果
Res Involv Engagem. 2022 Feb 5;8(1):3. doi: 10.1186/s40900-022-00338-w.
8
Patient Engagement in Research Scale (PEIRS-22): Danish translation, applicability, and user experiences.患者参与研究量表(PEIRS - 22):丹麦语翻译、适用性及用户体验
Res Involv Engagem. 2023 Dec 7;9(1):115. doi: 10.1186/s40900-023-00526-2.
9
Co-creating with patients an impact framework across the medicine's life cycle: a qualitative study exploring patients' experiences of involvement in and perceptions of impact measures.与患者共同创建贯穿药物生命周期的影响框架:一项探索患者参与影响措施的经历和认知的定性研究
Res Involv Engagem. 2022 Feb 2;8(1):1. doi: 10.1186/s40900-022-00334-0.
10
A qualitative exploration of motivations and barriers for community leisure organisations' engagement with the Jooay™ mobile app.社区休闲组织使用 Jooay™ 移动应用的动机和障碍的定性探索。
Disabil Rehabil. 2022 May;44(9):1737-1745. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2021.1986581. Epub 2021 Nov 3.

引用本文的文献

1
The People's Review protocol: planning an innovative study powered by the public.《人民评议》方案:规划一项由公众推动的创新性研究。
Res Involv Engagem. 2025 Mar 25;11(1):28. doi: 10.1186/s40900-025-00682-7.

本文引用的文献

1
The role of patient organisations in research and development: Evidence from rare diseases.患者组织在研发中的作用:来自罕见病的证据。
Soc Sci Med. 2023 Dec;338:116332. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2023.116332. Epub 2023 Oct 17.
2
Rethinking Patient Engagement in Cancer Research.重新思考患者在癌症研究中的参与度。
Patient. 2023 Mar;16(2):89-93. doi: 10.1007/s40271-022-00604-9. Epub 2022 Oct 27.
3
Patient and public involvement in oesophageal cancer survivorship research.患者和公众参与食管癌生存研究。
Acta Oncol. 2022 Mar;61(3):371-377. doi: 10.1080/0284186X.2021.2016950. Epub 2021 Dec 20.
4
Patient engagement in cancer research from the patient's perspective.从患者角度看癌症研究中的患者参与。
Future Oncol. 2021 Oct;17(28):3717-3728. doi: 10.2217/fon-2020-1198. Epub 2021 Jul 2.
5
Optimising Multi-stakeholder Practices in Patient Engagement: A Gap Analysis to Enable Focused Evolution of Patient Engagement in the Development and Lifecycle Management of Medicines.优化多方利益相关者在患者参与方面的实践:差距分析,以促进在药品开发和生命周期管理中患者参与的重点演进。
Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2021 Nov;55(6):1165-1179. doi: 10.1007/s43441-021-00313-9. Epub 2021 Jun 28.
6
Sustaining Meaningful Patient Engagement Across the Lifecycle of Medicines: A Roadmap for Action.贯穿药品全生命周期的有意义的患者参与:行动路线图。
Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2021 Sep;55(5):936-953. doi: 10.1007/s43441-021-00282-z. Epub 2021 May 10.
7
Patient and public involvement in health technology assessment: update of a systematic review of international experiences.患者和公众参与卫生技术评估:国际经验系统评价更新。
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2021 Feb 5;37:e36. doi: 10.1017/S0266462321000064.
8
Public and patient participation in health policy, care and research.公众和患者参与卫生政策、医疗保健及研究。
Porto Biomed J. 2017 Mar-Apr;2(2):31-32. doi: 10.1016/j.pbj.2017.01.001. Epub 2017 Mar 1.
9
Industry funding of patient and health consumer organisations: systematic review with meta-analysis.行业对患者和健康消费者组织的资助:系统评价与荟萃分析。
BMJ. 2020 Jan 22;368:l6925. doi: 10.1136/bmj.l6925.
10
Co-creation of patient engagement quality guidance for medicines development: an international multistakeholder initiative.共同制定药物研发患者参与质量指南:一项国际多利益相关方倡议。
BMJ Innov. 2019 Jan;5(1):43-55. doi: 10.1136/bmjinnov-2018-000317. Epub 2019 Mar 2.