Mulhall A
Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2001 Jun;5(2):121-7. doi: 10.1054/ejon.2001.0129.
Despite increasing efforts by both the government and the professions to institute evidence-based practice, there still remains a significant research practice gap in UK nursing. This paper explores the two worlds of practice and research and the factors that may affect them. It suggests that academic researchers and practitioners often have different perspectives and are working under different imperatives. These different cultures need to be recognized and made more explicit. Consideration will be given as to what sort of evidence is required by practitioners to nurse effectively, how we should identify this evidence and the role which research plays. The disharmony between the worlds of research and practice extends the discussion to consider the ways in which research is produced and disseminated. The question is raised as to why researchers fail to identify the contingencies, adaptations and social biases that affect their work. Strategies that might facilitate a franker discussion of research and the way in which it is produced will be illustrated by examples of research work undertaken by the author.
尽管政府和专业人士为推行循证实践付出了越来越多的努力，但英国护理领域的研究与实践之间仍存在显著差距。本文探讨了实践和研究这两个领域以及可能影响它们的因素。研究表明，学术研究人员和从业者往往有不同的观点，且工作的侧重点也不同。这些不同的文化需要得到认可并更加明确。本文将考虑从业者有效护理所需的证据类型、我们应如何识别这些证据以及研究所起的作用。研究与实践领域之间的不和谐使得讨论进一步延伸至研究的产生和传播方式。文章提出了一个问题，即为什么研究人员未能识别影响其工作的意外情况、适应性因素和社会偏见。作者所开展的研究工作实例将说明有助于更坦率地讨论研究及其产生方式的策略。
