Momartin S, Silove D, Manicavasagar V, Steel Z
School of Psychiatry, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.
Soc Sci Med. 2003 Sep;57(5):775-81. doi: 10.1016/s0277-9536(02)00452-5.
Refugee survivors of inter-ethnic warfare vary greatly in the extent and range of their trauma experiences. Discerning which experiences are most salient to generating and perpetuating disorders such as posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) is critical to the mounting rational strategies for targeted psychosocial interventions. In a sample of Bosnian Muslim refugees (n=126) drawn from a community centre and supplemented by a snowball sampling method, PTSD status and associated disability were measured using the clinician-administered PTSD Scale (CAPS) for DSM-IV. A principal components analysis (PCA) based on a pool of trauma items yielded four coherent trauma dimensions: Human Rights Violations, Threat to Life, Traumatic Loss and Dispossession and Eviction. A cluster analysis identified three subgroupings according to extent of trauma exposure. There were no differences in PTSD risk for the group most exposed to human rights violations (internment in concentration camps, torture) compared to the general war-exposed group. Logistic regression analysis using the dimensions derived from the PCA indicated that Threat to Life alone of the four trauma factors predicted PTSD status, a finding that supports the DSM-IV definition of a trauma. Both Threat to Life and Traumatic Loss contributed to symptom severity and disability associated with PTSD. It may be that human rights violations pose a more general threat to the survivor's future psychosocial adaptation in areas of functioning that extend beyond the confines of PTSD.
族裔间战争的难民幸存者在创伤经历的程度和范围上差异很大。识别哪些经历对于引发和延续诸如创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)等疾病最为显著,对于制定有针对性的心理社会干预的合理策略至关重要。在一个从社区中心抽取并通过滚雪球抽样方法补充的波斯尼亚穆斯林难民样本(n = 126)中,使用针对《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第四版(DSM-IV)的临床医生管理的创伤后应激障碍量表(CAPS)来测量创伤后应激障碍状态和相关残疾情况。基于一系列创伤项目进行的主成分分析(PCA)得出了四个连贯的创伤维度:侵犯人权、生命威胁、创伤性损失以及剥夺与驱逐。聚类分析根据创伤暴露程度确定了三个亚组。与一般战争暴露组相比,最暴露于侵犯人权行为(被关押在集中营、遭受酷刑)的组在创伤后应激障碍风险方面没有差异。使用从主成分分析得出的维度进行的逻辑回归分析表明,四个创伤因素中仅生命威胁可预测创伤后应激障碍状态,这一发现支持了DSM-IV对创伤的定义。生命威胁和创伤性损失均导致了与创伤后应激障碍相关的症状严重程度和残疾情况。侵犯人权行为可能对幸存者在功能领域的未来心理社会适应构成更广泛的威胁,其范围超出了创伤后应激障碍的范畴。