Eslick Guy D, Fass Ronnie
Department of Medicine, University of Sydney, Nepean Hospital, Level 5, South Block, PO Box 63, Penrith, New South Wales 2751, Australia.
Gastroenterol Clin North Am. 2003 Jun;32(2):531-52. doi: 10.1016/s0889-8553(03)00029-3.
Noncardiac chest pain is a heterogeneous condition for which diagnosis and treatment are challenging. Research is needed to streamline evaluation to minimize unnecessary invasive testing and costs. Chest pain clinics to assess chest pain patients are popular in the United States and may be of value in reassuring patients and reducing presentation to hospital; however, recently this has been contended [111]. Options for the effective treatment of NCCP are dependent on the risk of an adverse outcome and the cost-effectiveness of the management algorithm that is followed. Most (64%) of those presenting to the emergency department with chest pain are classified as having NCCP [112,113]. GERD is probably the most important cause and application of a test of acid suppression with a high-dose PPI for 1 to 2 weeks seems to be a useful diagnostic tool. In those patients with GERD-related NCCP, short-term and potentially long-term therapy with a PPI (commonly higher than standard dose) is required to alleviate symptoms. Esophageal dysmotility is relatively uncommon in patients with NCCP and evaluation by esophageal manometry might be limited to rule out achalasia. Chest wall syndromes are common but probably often missed. Many patients with NCCP have psychologic or psychiatric abnormalities, as either the cause or an effect of the chest pain, but diagnosis here depends on techniques not applied easily in the acute situation. Pain modulators seem to offer significant improvement in chest pain symptoms for non-GERD-related NCCP. Finally, trials of management strategies to deal with this problem are required urgently, because the earlier discharge of patients with NCCP may exacerbate the problem. Fig. 2 provides a flow chart for diagnosis and treatment of NCCP.
非心源性胸痛是一种异质性疾病,其诊断和治疗具有挑战性。需要开展研究以简化评估流程,从而将不必要的侵入性检查和费用降至最低。在美国,用于评估胸痛患者的胸痛诊所很常见,可能有助于安抚患者并减少其前往医院就诊的次数;然而,最近这一观点受到了质疑[111]。非心源性胸痛的有效治疗方案取决于不良结局的风险以及所遵循的管理算法的成本效益。大多数(64%)因胸痛前往急诊科就诊的患者被归类为患有非心源性胸痛[112,113]。胃食管反流病可能是最重要的病因,使用高剂量质子泵抑制剂进行1至2周的抑酸试验似乎是一种有用的诊断工具。对于那些患有与胃食管反流病相关的非心源性胸痛的患者,需要使用质子泵抑制剂(通常高于标准剂量)进行短期和可能的长期治疗以缓解症状。食管动力障碍在非心源性胸痛患者中相对少见,食管测压评估可能仅限于排除贲门失弛缓症。胸壁综合征很常见,但可能常常被漏诊。许多非心源性胸痛患者存在心理或精神异常,这可能是胸痛的原因或结果,但在此处的诊断取决于在急性情况下不易应用的技术。对于与胃食管反流病无关的非心源性胸痛,疼痛调节剂似乎能显著改善胸痛症状。最后,迫切需要开展应对这一问题的管理策略试验,因为非心源性胸痛患者的早期出院可能会使问题恶化。图2提供了非心源性胸痛的诊断和治疗流程图。