Suppr超能文献

用于客观评估打鼾和睡眠呼吸暂停中上气道狭窄的现有技术。

Available techniques for objective assessment of upper airway narrowing in snoring and sleep apnea.

作者信息

Faber Christian E, Grymer Luisa

机构信息

Department of Otorhinolaryngology, University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.

出版信息

Sleep Breath. 2003 Jun;7(2):77-86. doi: 10.1007/s11325-003-0077-9.

Abstract

A number of techniques are available to determine the level of obstructive predominance in snoring and in the obstructive sleep apnea hypopnea syndrome (OSAHS): lateral cephalography, awake endoscopy, awake endoscopy with the Müller maneuver, endoscopy during sleep, endoscopy with nasal continuous positive airway pressure during sleep, fluoroscopy, CT scanning, MR scanning, manometry, and acoustic reflections. Data from different studies using various methods suggest that different patients have different patterns of narrowing or collapse of the pharynx. No reference standard exists for the determination of the predominant obstructive level during obstructive events, so further investigations are necessary to improve and validate existing methods and develop new techniques. These would improve our understanding of the pathophysiology of OSAHS and snoring and help to select the correct treatment option for different patients. This article lists criteria that must be used to assess the available techniques for diagnosis of obstruction level in snoring and OSAHS. The advantages and limitations of each diagnostic technique are summarized, with emphasis on the acoustic reflectometry technique.

摘要

有多种技术可用于确定打鼾和阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停低通气综合征(OSAHS)中阻塞性优势的程度:侧位头影测量、清醒内镜检查、Müller动作下的清醒内镜检查、睡眠期间的内镜检查、睡眠期间鼻持续气道正压通气下的内镜检查、荧光透视、CT扫描、MR扫描、测压法和声反射测量。来自使用各种方法的不同研究的数据表明,不同患者的咽部狭窄或塌陷模式不同。在阻塞性事件期间,不存在用于确定主要阻塞水平的参考标准,因此需要进一步研究以改进和验证现有方法并开发新技术。这些将增进我们对OSAHS和打鼾病理生理学的理解,并有助于为不同患者选择正确的治疗方案。本文列出了评估打鼾和OSAHS阻塞水平诊断可用技术时必须使用的标准。总结了每种诊断技术的优缺点,重点是声反射测量技术。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验