Floegel-Niesmann G, Bunzenthal C, Fischer S, Moennig V
EU Reference Laboratory for CSF, Institute of Virology, School of Veterinary Medicine, Buenteweg 17, 30559 Hannover, Germany.
J Vet Med B Infect Dis Vet Public Health. 2003 Jun;50(5):214-20. doi: 10.1046/j.1439-0450.2003.00663.x.
The clinical diagnosis of classical swine fever (CSF) still caused problems to the veterinarians during the last decade. The primary CSF outbreak was often detected too late and, meanwhile, the virus had spread. Consequently, the recent classical swine fever virus isolates (CSFV) were suspected to be of low virulence. The purpose of the study was to quantify the virulence of four recent CSFV by evaluating the clinical and pathological signs caused by different CSFV. Pigs of the same breed and age group were inoculated intranasally with CSFV from recent epidemics in European Union (EU) member states. The CSFV used are registered in the data base of the EU Reference Laboratory for CSF and belong to different genotypes: 2.1, 2.2 and 2.3 respectively. Clinical signs of CSF were evaluated by using a score system suggested previously (Mittelholzer et al., 2000: Vet. Microbiol. 74, 293). For the evaluation of pathological lesions, a new pathological score was introduced. The four CSFV tested here were classified as moderately virulent in general, although one CSFV may cause different clinical courses, ranging from highly virulent to avirulent. This indicates the importance of additional factors in the host animal for virulence. Differences in the clinical and pathological signs between these four recent CSFV were rather minor, emphasizing that the genetic typing of CSFV is absolutely essential. Differences towards former CSFV (e.g. reference virus strain Alfort 187) were more pronounced, especially regarding the onset and duration of the disease, the occurrence of skin haemorrhages and pathological lesions of kidney, subcutis and serosae. It is concluded that clinical diagnosis of CSF is rather difficult in pigs up to 14 days post-CSFV infection using these four CSFV, emphasizing the need for careful differential diagnosis and the laboratory investigation for CSF at an early stage.
在过去十年中,经典猪瘟(CSF)的临床诊断仍给兽医带来诸多问题。原发性CSF疫情往往发现过晚,在此期间病毒已传播开来。因此,近期分离出的经典猪瘟病毒(CSFV)被怀疑毒力较低。本研究的目的是通过评估不同CSFV引起的临床和病理症状来量化四种近期CSFV的毒力。将相同品种和年龄组的猪经鼻接种来自欧盟成员国近期疫情的CSFV。所使用的CSFV已在欧盟CSF参考实验室的数据库中登记,分别属于不同的基因型:2.1、2.2和2.3。通过使用先前建议的评分系统(Mittelholzer等人,2000年:《兽医微生物学》74卷,第293页)评估CSF的临床症状。为评估病理损伤,引入了一种新的病理评分。总体而言,这里测试的四种CSFV被归类为中等毒力,尽管一种CSFV可能导致不同的临床病程,从高毒力到无毒力不等。这表明宿主动物中的其他因素对毒力的重要性。这四种近期CSFV之间的临床和病理症状差异相当小,强调CSFV的基因分型绝对至关重要。与以前的CSFV(例如参考病毒株阿尔福特187)的差异更为明显,特别是在疾病的发病和持续时间、皮肤出血的发生以及肾脏、皮下组织和浆膜的病理损伤方面。得出的结论是,使用这四种CSFV在CSFV感染后14天内对猪进行CSF的临床诊断相当困难,强调需要进行仔细的鉴别诊断以及在早期阶段对CSF进行实验室调查。