Vitevitch Michael S
Department of Psychology, University of Kansas, Lawrence 66045, USA.
Lang Speech. 2002 Dec;45(Pt 4):407-34. doi: 10.1177/00238309020450040501.
A comparison of the lexical characteristics of 88 auditory misperceptions (i.e., slips of the ear) showed no difference in word-frequency, neighborhood density, and neighborhood frequency between the actual and the perceived utterances. Another comparison of slip of the ear tokens (i.e., actual and perceived utterances) and words in general (i.e., randomly selected from the lexicon) showed that slip of the ear tokens had denser neighborhoods and higher neighborhood frequency than words in general, as predicted from laboratory studies. Contrary to prediction, slip of the ear tokens were higher in frequency of occurrence than words in general. Additional laboratory-based investigations examined the possible source of the contradictory word frequency finding, highlighting the importance of using naturalistic and experimental data to develop models of spoken language processing.
对88个听觉错误感知（即耳误）的词汇特征进行比较后发现，实际话语与感知话语在词频、邻域密度和邻域频率上没有差异。对耳误样本（即实际话语和感知话语）与一般词汇（即从词汇表中随机选取）的另一项比较表明，正如实验室研究所预测的那样，耳误样本的邻域比一般词汇更密集，邻域频率更高。与预测相反的是，耳误样本的出现频率高于一般词汇。基于实验室的进一步调查研究了这一矛盾的词频发现的可能原因，强调了使用自然主义和实验数据来开发口语处理模型的重要性。
