• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在多危险因素干预试验中,特殊干预措施可降低依从性参与者的心血管疾病死亡率。

Special intervention reduces CVD mortality for adherent participants in the multiple risk factor intervention trial.

作者信息

Gump Brooks B, Matthews Karen A

机构信息

State University of New York, Oswego, USA.

出版信息

Ann Behav Med. 2003 Aug;26(1):61-8. doi: 10.1207/S15324796ABM2601_08.

DOI:10.1207/S15324796ABM2601_08
PMID:12867355
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Patient adherence affects treatment efficacy, and surprisingly, adherence is frequently associated with reductions in mortality for those receiving placebo.

METHODS

This study considers the role of trial adherence for men (N = 12,338) in the Multiple Risk Factor Intervention Trial (MRFIT), a prospective study of 9-year follow-up mortality following randomization to Special Intervention (SI) or Usual Care (UC). Annual visit attendance rates were used as a measure of adherence.

RESULTS

A significant Adherence x Group Assignment interaction (p =.002) revealed that SI significantly reduced cardiovascular disease (CVD) mortality for highly adherent participants, RR =.91 (95% confidence interval [CI] =.84-.99) but significantly increased CVD mortality for poorly adherent participants, RR = 1.28 (95% CI = 1.05-1.57) when compared to UC. These associations remained after controlling for baseline characteristics (e.g., income), reported illness, or occurrence of a nonfatal CVD event during the trial. The beneficial effect of SI among the adherent participants was partly due to reduced smoking and diastolic blood pressure levels during the trial.

CONCLUSIONS

SI significantly reduced the risk of CVD mortality for participants adherent with the MRFIT, and this effect was accounted for by positive changes in CVD risk factors. These findings suggest a method for evaluating treatment efficacy in subgroups determined by patient responses (e.g., adherence to annual assessment visits) to the treatment program after randomization.

摘要

背景

患者的依从性会影响治疗效果,令人惊讶的是,对于接受安慰剂治疗的患者,依从性常常与死亡率降低相关。

方法

本研究探讨了在多重危险因素干预试验(MRFIT)中男性(N = 12338)的试验依从性所起的作用,该试验是一项前瞻性研究,对随机分配至特殊干预(SI)或常规护理(UC)的患者进行9年随访死亡率观察。年度就诊率被用作依从性的衡量指标。

结果

显著的依从性×分组分配交互作用(p =.002)表明,与UC相比,SI显著降低了高依从性参与者的心血管疾病(CVD)死亡率,相对危险度(RR) =.91(95%置信区间[CI] =.84 -.99),但显著增加了低依从性参与者的CVD死亡率,RR = 1.28(95% CI = 1.05 - 1.57)。在控制了基线特征(如收入)、报告的疾病或试验期间非致命CVD事件的发生情况后,这些关联依然存在。SI在依从性参与者中的有益效果部分归因于试验期间吸烟和舒张压水平的降低。

结论

SI显著降低了MRFIT依从性参与者的CVD死亡风险,这种效果是由CVD危险因素的积极变化所导致的。这些发现提示了一种在随机分组后根据患者对治疗方案的反应(如对年度评估就诊依从性)所确定的亚组中评估治疗效果的方法。

相似文献

1
Special intervention reduces CVD mortality for adherent participants in the multiple risk factor intervention trial.在多危险因素干预试验中,特殊干预措施可降低依从性参与者的心血管疾病死亡率。
Ann Behav Med. 2003 Aug;26(1):61-8. doi: 10.1207/S15324796ABM2601_08.
2
Hostile behaviors predict cardiovascular mortality among men enrolled in the Multiple Risk Factor Intervention Trial.在多重危险因素干预试验中,敌对行为可预测男性的心血管疾病死亡率。
Circulation. 2004 Jan 6;109(1):66-70. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000105766.33142.13. Epub 2003 Dec 8.
3
Risk factor changes after cessation of intervention in the Multiple Risk Factor Intervention Trial. The MRFIT Research Group.多重危险因素干预试验中干预停止后的危险因素变化。MRFIT研究小组。
Prev Med. 1991 Mar;20(2):183-96. doi: 10.1016/0091-7435(91)90019-z.
4
Mortality after 10 1/2 years for hypertensive participants in the Multiple Risk Factor Intervention Trial.多重危险因素干预试验中高血压参与者10.5年后的死亡率。
Circulation. 1990 Nov;82(5):1616-28. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.82.5.1616.
5
Depressive symptoms and mortality in men: results from the Multiple Risk Factor Intervention Trial.男性的抑郁症状与死亡率:多重危险因素干预试验的结果
Stroke. 2005 Jan;36(1):98-102. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000149626.50127.d0. Epub 2004 Nov 29.
6
Lung cancer mortality after 16 years in MRFIT participants in intervention and usual-care groups. Multiple Risk Factor Intervention Trial.MRFIT研究中干预组和常规护理组参与者16年后的肺癌死亡率。多重危险因素干预试验。
Ann Epidemiol. 1997 Feb;7(2):125-36. doi: 10.1016/s1047-2797(96)00123-8.
7
Multiple risk factor intervention trial revisited: a new perspective based on nonfatal and fatal composite endpoints, coronary and cardiovascular, during the trial.再次审视多项危险因素干预试验:基于试验期间非致死性和致死性复合终点、冠状动脉和心血管的新视角。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2012 Oct;1(5):e003640. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.112.003640. Epub 2012 Oct 25.
8
Mortality after 16 years for participants randomized to the Multiple Risk Factor Intervention Trial.随机分配至多重危险因素干预试验的参与者16年后的死亡率。
Circulation. 1996 Sep 1;94(5):946-51. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.94.5.946.
9
Baseline rest electrocardiographic abnormalities, antihypertensive treatment, and mortality in the Multiple Risk Factor Intervention Trial. Multiple Risk Factor Intervention Trial Research Group.多重危险因素干预试验中的基线静息心电图异常、抗高血压治疗与死亡率。多重危险因素干预试验研究组
Am J Cardiol. 1985 Jan 1;55(1):1-15. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(85)90290-5.
10
Hypertension management in the Multiple Risk Factor Intervention Trial (MRFIT). Six-year intervention results for men in special intervention and usual care groups.多重危险因素干预试验(MRFIT)中的高血压管理。特殊干预组和常规护理组男性的六年干预结果。
Arch Intern Med. 1985 Jul;145(7):1191-9.

引用本文的文献

1
Improving treatment adherence in patients with bipolar disorder and substance abuse: rationale and initial development of a novel psychosocial approach.改善双相情感障碍与物质滥用患者的治疗依从性:一种新型心理社会方法的基本原理与初步发展
J Psychiatr Pract. 2011 Jan;17(1):5-20. doi: 10.1097/01.pra.0000393840.18099.d6.
2
Multiple risk factor interventions for primary prevention of coronary heart disease.用于冠心病一级预防的多重危险因素干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011 Jan 19;2011(1):CD001561. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001561.pub3.
3
Baseline patient characteristics and mortality associated with longitudinal intervention compliance.
与纵向干预依从性相关的基线患者特征和死亡率。
Stat Med. 2007 Dec 10;26(28):5100-15. doi: 10.1002/sim.2909.