Suppr超能文献

在诊室之外血压控制良好,但诊室血压控制不佳的接受治疗的高血压患者中出现的左心室肥厚。

Left ventricular hypertrophy in treated hypertensive patients with good blood pressure control outside the clinic, but poor clinic blood pressure control.

作者信息

Cuspidi Cesare, Michev Iassen, Meani Stefano, Salerno Maurizio, Valerio Cristiana, Fusi Veronica, Bertazzoli Giovanni, Magrini Fabio, Zanchetti Alberto

机构信息

Instituto di Clinica Medica e Terapia Medica and Centro Interuniversitario di Fisiologia Clinica e Ipertensione, Universitá di Milano, Ospedale Maggiore IRCCS, Milan, Italy.

出版信息

J Hypertens. 2003 Aug;21(8):1575-81. doi: 10.1097/00004872-200308000-00023.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the study was to evaluate the prevalence of left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) in treated patients with good blood pressure (BP) control during multiple home BP (HBP) measurements and during 24-h ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM), but with unsatisfactory BP control in the clinic. These patients were compared with treated hypertensives whose BP was well controlled under the three circumstances.

METHODS

Seventy-two treated consecutive patients (group I, age 56 +/- 10 years) with clinic BP values > or = 140/90 mmHg, and a difference between clinic and self-measured HBP > 10 mmHg for diastolic blood pressure (DBP) and/or > 20 mmHg for systolic blood pressure (SBP), underwent the following procedures: (1) clinic BP measurement; (2) routine diagnostic work-up; (3) HBP monitoring; (4) 24-h ABPM; (5) echocardiography. Thirty-five hypertensive patients with satisfactory BP control according to clinic (< 140/90 mmHg), HBP (< or = 131/82 mmHg) and ABP criteria (< or = 125/79 mmHg) were included as the control group (group II, age 55 +/- 9 years).

RESULTS

In group I, 33 subjects out of the 72 (46%) with clinic BP > 140/90 mmHg had BP values controlled outside the clinic (23 according to HBP criteria and 22 according to ABP criteria). The prevalence of LVH (LV mass index > 134 g/m2 in men and > 110 g/m2 in women) was significantly higher in these patients (15.1 versus 2.8%, P < 0.01) than in group II (BP also controlled in the clinic), despite the fact that HBP and ABP were reduced to similar levels in the two groups. CONCLUSIONS Our data provide evidence that treated hypertensive patients with good BP control at home or during ambulatory monitoring, but incomplete BP control in the clinic, have more pronounced cardiac alterations than patients with both clinic and out of the clinic BP control. This finding offers a new piece of information about the diagnostic value of BP measurement in the clinic to assess BP control during antihypertensive treatment.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估在多次家庭血压(HBP)测量和24小时动态血压监测(ABPM)期间血压(BP)控制良好,但诊室血压控制不佳的已治疗患者中左心室肥厚(LVH)的患病率。将这些患者与在三种情况下血压均得到良好控制的已治疗高血压患者进行比较。

方法

72例连续接受治疗的患者(I组,年龄56±10岁),诊室血压值≥140/90 mmHg,且诊室血压与自测HBP之间的舒张压(DBP)差值>10 mmHg和/或收缩压(SBP)差值>20 mmHg,接受以下检查:(1)诊室血压测量;(2)常规诊断检查;(3)HBP监测;(4)24小时ABPM;(5)超声心动图检查。35例根据诊室血压(<140/90 mmHg)、HBP(≤131/82 mmHg)和ABP标准(≤125/79 mmHg)血压控制良好的高血压患者作为对照组(II组,年龄55±9岁)。

结果

在I组中,72例诊室血压>140/90 mmHg的患者中有33例(46%)在诊室外血压得到控制(根据HBP标准为23例,根据ABP标准为22例)。尽管两组的HBP和ABP均降至相似水平,但这些患者中LVH(男性左心室质量指数>134 g/m²,女性>110 g/m²)的患病率显著高于II组(诊室血压也得到控制)(15.1%对2.8%,P<0.01)。结论我们的数据表明,在家中或动态监测期间血压控制良好,但诊室血压控制不完全的已治疗高血压患者,比诊室血压和诊室外血压均得到控制的患者有更明显的心脏改变。这一发现为诊室血压测量在评估降压治疗期间血压控制方面的诊断价值提供了新的信息。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验