Shahriari Majid, Rotenberg Daniel Kaminski, Nielsen Jesper Kent, Wiinberg Niels, Nielsen Poul Ebbe
Department of Internal Medicine, Frederikssund County Hospital, Frederikssund, Denmark.
Blood Press. 2003;12(3):155-9. doi: 10.1080/08037050310007998.
Five different semiautomatic manometers were tested, where oscillometry is the measuring principle. Three of the manometers (Omron R4, A&D UB 322 and Braun) were wrist manometers, where the occluding cuff is placed around the volar surface of the wrist. Two of the manometers (A&D UA 777 and Omron M4) measure on the upper arm. The investigation included 72 patients with systolic blood pressure (SBP) ranging between 110 and 200, and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) between 62 and 114 mmHg. Forty-five of the subjects were on antihypertensive medication when the manometer tests were carried out. Each of the manometers was tested with double measurements of blood pressure against 2 x 2 auscultatory measurements done before and after the semiautomatic readings. The auscultatory measurements are all performed by the same observer, who was blinded for the measurements with semiautomatic manometers. The mean difference between the oscillometric recordings compared to auscultatory measurements varied from +1.2 to -8.5 mmHg for SBP and from -0.5 to -8.3 mmHg for DBP. However, the interindividual differences varied considerable with standard deviation of the difference varying from 8 to 18 mmHg for SBP with the highest values for wrist manometers. Concerning DBP, the standard deviation of difference for all five manometers was between 6 and 8 mmHg, with the highest values for wrist manometers. None of the tested manometers fulfilled the criteria for grading A or B in the previously introduced grading by the British Hypertension Society. To conclude, the upper-arm manometers have a measuring accuracy for SBP a little higher than that of the wrist manometers, while there is no bigger difference in the measuring accuracy of DBP. The most important point is that the measuring accuracy in a single patient is unpredictable. If home readings are prepared, a test of the accuracy against auscultatory recordings should be done in every single patient. In the clinical wards, it is important to be aware of the measuring accuracy if oscillometric measurements are introduced replacing auscultatory measurements.
测试了五种不同的半自动血压计,其测量原理均为示波法。其中三种血压计(欧姆龙R4、爱安德UB 322和博朗)为腕式血压计,其袖带环绕在手腕掌侧。另外两种血压计(爱安德UA 777和欧姆龙M4)则测量上臂血压。该研究纳入了72例收缩压(SBP)在110至200之间、舒张压(DBP)在62至114 mmHg之间的患者。在进行血压计测试时,45名受试者正在服用抗高血压药物。每种血压计均进行两次血压测量,并与半自动读数前后进行的2×2听诊测量结果进行对比。所有听诊测量均由同一名观察者进行,该观察者对使用半自动血压计的测量结果不知情。与听诊测量相比,示波测量记录的SBP平均差值在+1.2至-8.5 mmHg之间,DBP平均差值在-0.5至-8.3 mmHg之间。然而,个体间差异变化很大,SBP差值的标准差在8至18 mmHg之间,腕式血压计的差值最高。关于DBP,所有五种血压计的差值标准差在6至8 mmHg之间,腕式血压计的差值最高。在英国高血压学会先前引入的分级中,没有一种测试的血压计符合A或B级标准。总之,上臂血压计测量SBP的准确性略高于腕式血压计,而在测量DBP的准确性方面没有更大差异。最重要的一点是,单个患者的测量准确性是不可预测的。如果准备在家中测量血压,应针对每位患者与听诊记录进行准确性测试。在临床病房,如果引入示波测量以取代听诊测量,了解测量准确性很重要。