Suppr超能文献

[How relevant is statin therapy for clinical practice?].

作者信息

Bonelli Johannes

机构信息

Imabe-Institut für medizinische Anthropologie und Bioethik, Wien.

出版信息

Wien Med Wochenschr. 2003;153(11-12):260-3. doi: 10.1046/j.1563-258x.2003.03032.x.

Abstract

In the time of evidenced-based medicine results of randomised controlled trials with statins mostly are presented in terms of relative risk reduction and commonly declare this treatment to be "lifesaving". The way, how research data are presented, however, influences health care decisions and can greatly affect a physicians perception of treatment benefits and his willingness to prescribe. In addition, arguments for a lifesaving by statins are not supported by the underlying data, but show that in real terms the effect of the treatment is reduced to a relative short gain in lifetime depending also on age. E.g. the expected lifetime gain of a 45 year old high-risk patient due to therapy with statins is 2.3 years and only 0.7 years of a 70 year old patient. The lifetime gain is even much smaller in low risk patients (month only). From this point of view it is of note that lifelong treatment with statins must focus not only on risk reduction but also on the welfare of the patient in a comprehensive fashion. Therefore a small gain in lifespan may be sacrificed if the "price" gets too high (e.g. side effects of the drug, risks, troubles with compliance, reduced quality of life).

摘要

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验