de Pablo Alcázar F, Albacete Belmonte A, Meroño Méndez A, Artiz Martínez M, Berbell Torrecilla F, García Peñalver A, Giménez Giménez L, Martínez de Salazar Arboleas A, Mateu Sabater A, Plaza Tobarra R
Departamento de Metodología y Análisis del Comportamiento, Universidad de Murcia.
Actas Luso Esp Neurol Psiquiatr Cienc Afines. 1992 Nov-Dec;20(6):257-62.
After a brief description of the Diagnostic Interview Schedule, versión III, spanish, we studied the agreement between diagnoses by a clinical standard and diagnoses by the DIS. As clinical standard we used the lifetime diagnoses given by expert psychiatrists to 135 patients who had been longitudinally assessed, with follow up periods amounting to 14 years. Sensitivities, for the fourteen diagnostic categories, varied between 64 per 100 and 100 per 100. Specificity was above 93 per 100 for all diagnoses, and K values ranged from .50 to 1.00, surpassing .60 for eleven of the fourteen categories.
在简要描述了《诊断访谈表》第三版西班牙语版之后,我们研究了临床标准诊断与该诊断访谈表诊断之间的一致性。作为临床标准,我们采用了专家精神科医生对135例患者进行纵向评估得出的终生诊断结果,随访期长达14年。对于14个诊断类别,敏感度在每100例中有64例至每100例中有100例之间变化。所有诊断的特异度均高于每100例中的93例,K值范围为0.50至1.00,14个类别中有11个超过了0.60。