Fujita Kazuo, Kuroshima Hika, Asai Saori
Graduate School of Letters, Kyoto University, Sakyo, Kyoto 606-8501, Japan.
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 2003 Jul;29(3):233-42. doi: 10.1037/0097-7403.29.3.233.
Four tufted capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella) were trained to choose from 2 hook-like tools, 1 of which successfully led to collecting food, whereas the other did not because of inappropriate spatial arrangement of the tool and the food. In Experiment 1, all of the monkeys successfully learned the basic task. The monkeys performed successfully with tools of novel colors and shapes in Experiments 2-5. These results demonstrate that the monkeys used the spatial arrangement of the tool and the food as a cue. However, they failed when there were obstacles (Experiment 6) or traps (Experiment 7) on the path along which the monkeys dragged tools. These results may suggest that capuchin monkeys understand the spatial relationship between 2 items, namely, food and the tool, but do not understand the spatial relationship among 3 items, namely, food, tool, and the environmental condition. The possible role of stimulus generalization is also considered.
四只簇绒卷尾猴(僧帽猴)接受训练,从两种钩状工具中进行选择,其中一种能成功获取食物,而另一种则因工具与食物的空间布局不当而无法获取。在实验1中,所有猴子都成功学会了基本任务。在实验2至5中,猴子使用新颖颜色和形状的工具也能成功完成任务。这些结果表明,猴子将工具与食物的空间布局作为线索。然而,当猴子拖动工具的路径上存在障碍物(实验6)或陷阱(实验7)时,它们就无法完成任务。这些结果可能表明,卷尾猴理解食物与工具这两个物品之间的空间关系,但不理解食物、工具和环境条件这三个物品之间的空间关系。同时也考虑了刺激泛化的可能作用。