• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

簇绒卷尾猴(僧帽猴)会自发地利用视觉而非听觉信息来寻找隐藏的食物。

Tufted capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella) spontaneously use visual but not acoustic information to find hidden food items.

作者信息

Paukner Annika, Huntsberry Mary E, Suomi Stephen J

机构信息

Laboratory of Comparative Ethology, National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, MD 20837, USA.

出版信息

J Comp Psychol. 2009 Feb;123(1):26-33. doi: 10.1037/a0013128.

DOI:10.1037/a0013128
PMID:19236142
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2648131/
Abstract

Foraging choices in tufted capuchins monkeys are guided by perceptual, cognitive, and motivational factors, but little is known about how these factors might interact. The present study investigates how different types of sensory information affect capuchins' ability to locate hidden food. In two experiments, capuchins were presented with two cups, one baited and one empty. Monkeys were given visual, acoustic, or acoustic-visual information related to the baited cup, the empty cup, or both baited and empty cup. Results show that capuchins spontaneously used visual information to locate food, and that information indicating presence and absence of food led to higher success rates than information indicating only absence of food. In contrast, acoustic information did not lead to success rates above chance levels and failed to enhance performance in combination with visual information. Capuchins spontaneously avoided a visually empty cup, but they did not appear to associate sounds with either the presence or absence of food. Being able to locate food items with the aid of acoustic cues might be a learned process that requires interactive experiences with the task's contingencies.

摘要

簇绒卷尾猴的觅食选择受感知、认知和动机因素的引导,但对于这些因素如何相互作用却知之甚少。本研究调查了不同类型的感官信息如何影响卷尾猴定位隐藏食物的能力。在两项实验中,给卷尾猴呈现两个杯子,一个装有食物,一个为空。猴子被给予与装有食物的杯子、空杯子或装有食物和空杯子两者相关的视觉、听觉或视听信息。结果表明,卷尾猴会自发地利用视觉信息来定位食物,并且表明食物存在与否的信息比仅表明食物不存在的信息带来更高的成功率。相比之下,听觉信息并未带来高于随机水平的成功率,并且与视觉信息结合时也未能提高表现。卷尾猴会自发地避开视觉上为空的杯子,但它们似乎并未将声音与食物的存在或不存在联系起来。借助听觉线索定位食物可能是一个需要与任务的偶然性进行互动体验的学习过程。

相似文献

1
Tufted capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella) spontaneously use visual but not acoustic information to find hidden food items.簇绒卷尾猴(僧帽猴)会自发地利用视觉而非听觉信息来寻找隐藏的食物。
J Comp Psychol. 2009 Feb;123(1):26-33. doi: 10.1037/a0013128.
2
Inferences about the location of food in capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella) in two sensory modalities.卷尾猴(僧帽猴属)通过两种感官模式对食物位置的推断
J Comp Psychol. 2008 May;122(2):156-66. doi: 10.1037/0735-7036.122.2.156.
3
Capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella) use positive, but not negative, auditory cues to infer food location.卷尾猴(Cebus apella)利用积极的、而不是消极的听觉线索来推断食物位置。
Anim Cogn. 2012 Jan;15(1):45-55. doi: 10.1007/s10071-011-0430-5. Epub 2011 Jun 17.
4
Use of olfactory cues in foraging by owl monkeys (Aotus nancymai) and capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella).夜猴(南美白夜猴)和卷尾猴(白喉卷尾猴)觅食时对嗅觉线索的运用。
J Comp Psychol. 1997 Jun;111(2):152-8. doi: 10.1037/0735-7036.111.2.152.
5
The relative use of proximity, shape similarity, and orientation as visual perceptual grouping cues in tufted capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella) and humans (Homo sapiens).簇绒卷尾猴(僧帽猴属)和人类(智人)将接近度、形状相似性和方向作为视觉感知分组线索的相对运用情况。
J Comp Psychol. 2009 Feb;123(1):56-68. doi: 10.1037/a0012674.
6
Use of visual, acoustic, and olfactory information during embedded invertebrate foraging in brown capuchins (Cebus apella).褐卷尾猴(Cebus apella)在嵌入式无脊椎动物觅食过程中对视觉、听觉和嗅觉信息的利用。
J Comp Psychol. 2004 Jun;118(2):200-5. doi: 10.1037/0735-7036.118.2.200.
7
Information seeking in capuchins (Cebus apella): a rudimentary form of metacognition?卷尾猴(褐卷尾猴)的信息搜寻:元认知的一种初级形式?
Anim Cogn. 2015 May;18(3):667-81. doi: 10.1007/s10071-015-0835-7. Epub 2015 Jan 15.
8
How do tufted capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella) understand causality involved in tool use?簇绒卷尾猴(僧帽猴)如何理解工具使用中涉及的因果关系?
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 2003 Jul;29(3):233-42. doi: 10.1037/0097-7403.29.3.233.
9
Transport of tools to food sites in tufted capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella).簇绒卷尾猴(僧帽猴属)将工具运输到食物地点的行为
Anim Cogn. 2004 Jul;7(3):193-8. doi: 10.1007/s10071-004-0213-3. Epub 2004 Mar 12.
10
Manual laterality in haptic and visual reaching tasks by tufted capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella). An association between hand preference and hand accuracy for food discrimination.簇绒卷尾猴(僧帽猴属)在触觉和视觉够物任务中的手动偏好。食物辨别中手偏好与手部准确性之间的关联。
Neuropsychologia. 2000;38(13):1685-92. doi: 10.1016/s0028-3932(00)00080-4.

引用本文的文献

1
Is inferential reasoning a distinctly human cognitive feature? Testing reasoning in cotton-top tamarins (Saguinus oedipus).推理是人类特有的认知特征吗?在棉顶狨(Saguinus oedipus)中测试推理能力。
J Comp Psychol. 2023 Nov;137(4):249-264. doi: 10.1037/com0000356. Epub 2023 Jun 12.
2
Both sheep and goats can solve inferential by exclusion tasks.绵羊和山羊都可以通过排除推理任务。
Anim Cogn. 2022 Dec;25(6):1631-1644. doi: 10.1007/s10071-022-01656-y. Epub 2022 Aug 3.
3
What happened? Do preschool children and capuchin monkeys spontaneously use visual traces to locate a reward?发生了什么?学龄前儿童和卷尾猴会自发地利用视觉痕迹来定位奖励吗?
Proc Biol Sci. 2021 Aug 11;288(1956):20211101. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2021.1101. Epub 2021 Aug 4.
4
Exclusion in the field: wild brown skuas find hidden food in the absence of visual information.领域排斥:野生棕海鸥在没有视觉信息的情况下找到隐藏的食物。
Anim Cogn. 2021 Jul;24(4):867-876. doi: 10.1007/s10071-021-01486-4. Epub 2021 Feb 16.
5
Chimpanzees show some evidence of selectively acquiring information by using tools, making inferences, and evaluating possible outcomes.黑猩猩通过使用工具、进行推理和评估可能的结果,表现出一些有选择地获取信息的迹象。
PLoS One. 2018 Apr 11;13(4):e0193229. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0193229. eCollection 2018.
6
The emergence of reasoning by the disjunctive syllogism in early childhood.幼儿期析取三段论推理的出现。
Cognition. 2016 Sep;154:40-48. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2016.05.012. Epub 2016 May 28.
7
Reasoning by exclusion in the kea (Nestor notabilis).啄羊鹦鹉(Nestor notabilis)的排除推理。
Anim Cogn. 2016 Sep;19(5):965-75. doi: 10.1007/s10071-016-0998-x. Epub 2016 May 21.
8
Inference by Exclusion in Goffin Cockatoos (Cacatua goffini).戈氏凤头鹦鹉(戈芬凤头鹦鹉,学名:Cacatua goffini)中的排除推理法
PLoS One. 2015 Aug 5;10(8):e0134894. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0134894. eCollection 2015.
9
Exclusion performance in dwarf goats (Capra aegagrus hircus) and sheep (Ovis orientalis aries).矮山羊(Capra aegagrus hircus)和绵羊(Ovis orientalis aries)的排除性能。
PLoS One. 2014 Apr 2;9(4):e93534. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0093534. eCollection 2014.
10
Why skill matters.为什么技能很重要。
Trends Cogn Sci. 2013 Sep;17(9):434-41. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2013.07.001. Epub 2013 Aug 1.

本文引用的文献

1
Inferences about the location of food in capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella) in two sensory modalities.卷尾猴(僧帽猴属)通过两种感官模式对食物位置的推断
J Comp Psychol. 2008 May;122(2):156-66. doi: 10.1037/0735-7036.122.2.156.
2
Causal cognition in human and nonhuman animals: a comparative, critical review.人类和非人类动物的因果认知:一项比较性的批判性综述。
Annu Rev Psychol. 2007;58:97-118. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.58.110405.085555.
3
Making inferences about the location of hidden food: social dog, causal ape.推断隐藏食物的位置:善于社交的狗,具有因果推理能力的猿。
J Comp Psychol. 2006 Feb;120(1):38-47. doi: 10.1037/0735-7036.120.1.38.
4
Redundant food searches by capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella): a failure of metacognition?卷尾猴(僧帽猴)多余的食物搜寻行为:元认知的失败?
Anim Cogn. 2006 Apr;9(2):110-7. doi: 10.1007/s10071-005-0007-2. Epub 2005 Sep 24.
5
Action experience alters 3-month-old infants' perception of others' actions.动作体验会改变3个月大婴儿对他人动作的感知。
Cognition. 2005 May;96(1):B1-11. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2004.07.004.
6
Inferences about the location of food in the great apes (Pan paniscus, Pan troglodytes, Gorilla gorilla, and Pongo pygmaeus).关于大型猿类(倭黑猩猩、黑猩猩、大猩猩和红毛猩猩)食物位置的推断。
J Comp Psychol. 2004 Jun;118(2):232-41. doi: 10.1037/0735-7036.118.2.232.
7
Use of visual, acoustic, and olfactory information during embedded invertebrate foraging in brown capuchins (Cebus apella).褐卷尾猴(Cebus apella)在嵌入式无脊椎动物觅食过程中对视觉、听觉和嗅觉信息的利用。
J Comp Psychol. 2004 Jun;118(2):200-5. doi: 10.1037/0735-7036.118.2.200.
8
How do tufted capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella) understand causality involved in tool use?簇绒卷尾猴(僧帽猴)如何理解工具使用中涉及的因果关系?
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 2003 Jul;29(3):233-42. doi: 10.1037/0097-7403.29.3.233.
9
Tap-scanning for invertebrates by capuchins (Cebus apella).
Folia Primatol (Basel). 2003 May-Jun;74(3):162-4. doi: 10.1159/000070650.
10
Assessment of rattlesnake dangerousness by California ground squirrels: exploitation of cues from rattling sounds.加利福尼亚地松鼠对响尾蛇危险性的评估:对来自响尾蛇发出声响的线索的利用。
Anim Behav. 1999 Jun;57(6):1301-1310. doi: 10.1006/anbe.1999.1095.