Grieveson Sue
Moving and Handling Department, Salford NHS Primary Care Trust, Salford.
J Tissue Viability. 2003 Jul;13(3):98-100, 102, 104 passim. doi: 10.1016/s0965-206x(03)80015-3.
This study investigated the reduction in lower limb oedema achieved when different combinations of intermittent pneumatic compression (IPC) pump settings were used. Twenty-seven individuals aged between 22 and 96 years, with ankle oedema of venous origin, were randomised to either a treatment or control group. Treatment was delivered via a Flowpac pump (Huntleigh Healthcare Ltd, Luton, UK) possessing variable controls. The control group were 'treated' by elevating both lower limbs. The average difference in limb volumes was compared, for each combination of pump setting, to changes in limb volume in the control group. These comparisons revealed that the highest mean reduction in limb volumes was recorded for a pressure of 40 mmHg (p = 0.02), 10 second deflation time (p = 0.0002) and 15 second inflation time (p = 0.0096). Other significant results were obtained by the 30 mmHg pressure (p = 0.017), 35 second deflation time (p = 0.018), and 5 and 45 second inflation times (p = 0.012, 0.013 respectively). For many setting combinations no significant differences were observed between the limb oedema seen in the control and experimental groups. The results should be interpreted with caution because of the large number of tests performed. In addition adverse effects were observed in six out of nine subjects at 70 mmHg pressure and this pressure was discontinued. One subject suffered cramp at 60 mmHg pressure. Lower pressures together with shorter inflation and deflation times appear to be more efficient than higher pressures and long inflation/deflation times. In addition the lack of significant reduction in oedema at pressures above 40 mmHg suggests that the higher pressures cause a tourniquet effect.
本研究调查了使用不同组合的间歇性气动压迫(IPC)泵设置时下肢水肿的减轻情况。27名年龄在22至96岁之间、患有静脉源性脚踝水肿的个体被随机分为治疗组或对照组。治疗通过具有可变控制装置的Flowpac泵(英国卢顿的亨特利医疗保健有限公司)进行。对照组通过抬高双下肢进行“治疗”。对于每种泵设置组合,将肢体体积的平均差异与对照组肢体体积的变化进行比较。这些比较表明,在压力为40 mmHg(p = 0.02)、放气时间为10秒(p = 0.0002)和充气时间为15秒(p = 0.0096)时,肢体体积的平均减少量最高。其他显著结果还包括30 mmHg压力(p = 0.017)、35秒放气时间(p = 0.018)以及5秒和45秒充气时间(分别为p = 0.012、0.013)。对于许多设置组合,对照组和实验组的肢体水肿之间未观察到显著差异。由于进行的测试数量众多,这些结果应谨慎解释。此外,在9名受试者中有6名在70 mmHg压力下观察到不良反应,该压力被停用。一名受试者在60 mmHg压力下出现抽筋。较低的压力以及较短的充气和放气时间似乎比较高的压力和较长的充气/放气时间更有效。此外,在压力高于40 mmHg时水肿没有显著减轻,这表明较高的压力会产生止血带效应。