Cobb William S, Lokey Jonathan S, Schwab Donald P, Crockett Jay A, Rex James C, Robbins James A
Academic Department of Surgery, Greenville Hospital System, Greenville, South Carolina 29605, USA.
Am Surg. 2003 Jul;69(7):578-80.
The purpose of this study was to examine the results of a single institution experience with hand-assisted laparoscopic colon resection for benign disease. We conducted a retrospective study of consecutive cases performed by experienced laparoscopic surgeons at a single institution. From August 1999 to June 2001, 37 patients underwent hand-assisted laparoscopic colon resection. Seventeen patients were male, and 20 were female. Median patient age was 58 years (range 20-80). Indications for surgery were: polyp (13), uncomplicated diverticular disease (eight), complicated diverticular disease (i.e., colovesicular fistula, phlegmon, etc.) (seven), chronic constipation (four), rectal prolapse (two), ulcerative colitis (one), endometriosis (one), and fecal incontinence (one). Procedures performed were: sigmoidectomy (14), right colectomy (nine), low anterior resection (seven), subtotal colectomy (five), cecectomy (one), and transverse colectomy (one). Variables examined were: conversion to open procedure, operative time, blood loss, time to return of flatus, length of postoperative hospital stay, and complications. There were no deaths. One case was converted to celiotomy (unable to rule out malignancy). The median operative time was 122 minutes (range 32-240) with a median operative blood loss of 132 mL (range 0-300). Return of flatus was noted (median) at postoperative day 3 (range 1-5), and the median length of stay after operation was 4 days (range 2-8). One patient developed a superficial wound infection, and there was one pelvic abscess (drained percutaneously). One patient developed urinary retention. There were no reoperations. In this single-institution experience hand-assisted laparoscopic elective colectomy for benign disease was successful in both straightforward and complicated cases. A low conversion rate to celiotomy and favorable operative times compared with published "pure" laparoscopic results suggest a flatter learning curve for handoscopy while retaining the benefits of "minimally invasive" surgery such as early return of flatus and short postoperative hospital stay. For these reasons hand-assisted laparoscopy should be considered an acceptable technique in elective colon resection for benign disease.
本研究的目的是探讨单机构开展手辅助腹腔镜结肠切除术治疗良性疾病的结果。我们对一家机构中经验丰富的腹腔镜外科医生连续实施的病例进行了回顾性研究。1999年8月至2001年6月,37例患者接受了手辅助腹腔镜结肠切除术。男性17例,女性20例。患者年龄中位数为58岁(范围20 - 80岁)。手术指征包括:息肉(13例)、非复杂性憩室病(8例)、复杂性憩室病(即结肠膀胱瘘、蜂窝织炎等)(7例)、慢性便秘(4例)、直肠脱垂(2例)、溃疡性结肠炎(1例)、子宫内膜异位症(1例)和大便失禁(1例)。实施的手术包括:乙状结肠切除术(14例)、右半结肠切除术(9例)、低位前切除术(7例)、次全结肠切除术(5例)、盲肠切除术(1例)和横结肠切除术(1例)。研究的变量包括:转为开腹手术、手术时间、失血量、胃肠功能恢复时间、术后住院时间和并发症。无死亡病例。1例转为剖腹手术(无法排除恶性肿瘤)。手术时间中位数为122分钟(范围32 - 240分钟),术中失血量中位数为132毫升(范围0 - 300毫升)。术后第3天(范围1 - 5天)出现胃肠功能恢复(中位数),术后住院时间中位数为4天(范围2 - 8天)。1例患者发生浅表伤口感染,1例盆腔脓肿(经皮引流)。1例患者发生尿潴留。无再次手术病例。在这一单机构经验中,手辅助腹腔镜选择性结肠切除术治疗良性疾病在简单和复杂病例中均取得成功。与已发表的“纯”腹腔镜手术结果相比,转为剖腹手术的比例较低且手术时间理想,这表明手辅助腹腔镜手术的学习曲线较为平缓,同时保留了“微创手术”的益处,如胃肠功能早期恢复和术后住院时间短。基于这些原因,手辅助腹腔镜手术应被视为择期结肠切除治疗良性疾病的一种可接受的技术。