Ironside J W
Division of Pathology, School of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, University of Edinburgh, Western General Hospital, Edingurgh EH4 2XU, UK.
J Clin Pathol. 2003 Aug;56(8):561-8. doi: 10.1136/jcp.56.8.561.
This article reviews published evidence on the diagnosis and classification of pituitary gland tumours and the relevance of histological and genetic features to prognosis. Much of the literature is devoted to the histological, ultrastructural, and immunocytochemical classification of pituitary adenomas (extensively supported by multicentre studies), with little consensus on the identification of prognostic features in adenomas, particularly in relation to invasion. There is a lack of correspondence between clinical and pathological criteria to identify and classify invasion, and a need to reassess the nomenclature and diagnostic criteria for invasive adenomas and carcinomas. Recent cytogenetic, genetic, and molecular biological studies have identified no consistent abnormalities in relation to pituitary tumour progression, although many genes are likely to be involved. In light of these uncertainties, an approach to the diagnosis and classification of pituitary adenomas is suggested, based on robust criteria from earlier studies and incorporating provisional data that require reassessment in large prospective studies with an adequate clinicopathological database.
本文综述了已发表的关于垂体肿瘤诊断与分类以及组织学和遗传学特征与预后相关性的证据。大部分文献致力于垂体腺瘤的组织学、超微结构和免疫细胞化学分类(多中心研究提供了广泛支持),但对于腺瘤预后特征的识别,尤其是与侵袭相关的特征,几乎没有共识。在识别和分类侵袭方面,临床和病理标准之间缺乏对应性,并且需要重新评估侵袭性腺瘤和癌的命名及诊断标准。尽管可能涉及许多基因,但近期的细胞遗传学、遗传学和分子生物学研究尚未发现与垂体肿瘤进展相关的一致异常。鉴于这些不确定性,基于早期研究的可靠标准并纳入需要在拥有充分临床病理数据库的大型前瞻性研究中重新评估的临时数据,提出了一种垂体腺瘤的诊断和分类方法。